平面QRS-T夹角对急性心力衰竭综合征不良预后的预测价值

彭佳华, 黄正壮, 莫黎芳, 等. 平面QRS-T夹角对急性心力衰竭综合征不良预后的预测价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2015, 31(6): 634-638. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2015.06.015
引用本文: 彭佳华, 黄正壮, 莫黎芳, 等. 平面QRS-T夹角对急性心力衰竭综合征不良预后的预测价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2015, 31(6): 634-638. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2015.06.015
PENG jiahua, HUANG Zhengzhuang, MO Lifang, et al. Prognostic value of planar QRS-T angle in patients with poor outcomes of acute heart failure syndrome[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2015, 31(6): 634-638. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2015.06.015
Citation: PENG jiahua, HUANG Zhengzhuang, MO Lifang, et al. Prognostic value of planar QRS-T angle in patients with poor outcomes of acute heart failure syndrome[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2015, 31(6): 634-638. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2015.06.015

平面QRS-T夹角对急性心力衰竭综合征不良预后的预测价值

  • 基金项目:

    百色市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(No:20130504)

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R541.6

Prognostic value of planar QRS-T angle in patients with poor outcomes of acute heart failure syndrome

  • 目的:通过分析平面QRS-T夹角与急性心力衰竭综合征(acute heart failure syndromes,AHFS)近、远期不良结局相关性评价其预后预测价值。方法:2所中心医院125例AHFS患者,根据入院首次心电图平面QRS-T夹角将患者分为<90°组和≥90°组。采集患者入院首次病史、体征、辅助检查等基线变量,比较两组患者基线参数差异。随访入院至出院后30d(近期)和1年(远期)不良结局发生情况,Kaplan-Meier(K-M)生存分析进行2组近、远期不良预后发生率差异比较,Cox回归模型多因素分析平面QRS-T夹角≥90°与不良预后关系。结果:所有患者平均平面QRS-T夹角为(116.5±46.9)°。≥90°组96例患者中远期不良结局92例,其中50例为近期不良结局患者。<90°组29例患者中远期不良结局19例,其中8例为近期不良结局患者。与<90°组患者相比,≥90°组心影增大、V1导联终末电势(PtfV1)≤-0.04 mm·s更多见,并且有更低的肾小球滤过率估计值(eGFR)和左室射血分数(LVEF)、更高的CK-MB和肌钙蛋白I。K-M曲线:两组近、远期不良结局发生率曲线差别均有统计学意义。经PtfV1≤-0.04mm·s、心影增大、eGFR、LVEF、CK-MB和肌钙蛋白I多因素校正后平面QRS-T夹角≥90°与近期不良结局发生率相关性无统计学意义(HR:1.78,95%CI:0.75~4.22,P=0.19),但仍是远期不良预后的独立预测因素(HR:2.04,95%CI:1.18~3.56,P=0.01)。结论:平面QRS-T夹角≥90°是本研究AHFS队列远期不良预后的独立预测因素,尚不能认为是近期不良预后的预测因素。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会中华医学会心血管病学分会.急性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(3):195-208.

    [2]

    PANG P S,KOMAJDA M,GHEORGHIADE M.The current and future management of acute heart failure syndromes[J].Eur Heart J,2010,31:784-793.

    [3]

    WEINTRAUB N L,COLLINS S P,PANG P S,et al.Acute heart failure syndromes:emergency department presentation,treatment,and disposition:current approaches and future aims:a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J].Circulation,2010,122:1975-1996.

    [4]

    陈玉国.机遇与挑战:急性心力衰竭综合征的诊治现状和展望[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2011,20(7):680

    [5]

    栾晓军,王国干.急性心力衰竭的流行现状和诊治进展[J].心血管病学进展,2010,31(6):800-804.

    [6]

    WALSH J R,SOLIMAN E Z,ILKHANOFF L,et al.Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease(from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis)[J].Am J Cardiol,2013,112:1880-1884.

    [7]

    WHANG W,SHIMBO D,LEVITAN E B,et al.Relations between QRS|T angle,cardiac risk factors,and mortality in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(NHANES III)[J].Am J Cardiol,2012,109:981-987.

    [8]

    PAVRI B B,HILLIS M B,SUBACIUS H,et al.Prognostic value and temporal behavior of the planar QRS-T angle in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy[J].Circulation,2008,117:3181-3186.

    [9]

    RAUTAHARJU P M,PRINEAS R J,WOOD J,et al.Electrocardiographic predictors of new-onset heart failure in men and in women free of coronary heart disease(from the Atherosclerosis in Communities[ARIC]Study)[J].Am J Cardiol,2007,100:1437-1441.

    [10]

    JIMENO S A,GIL V,MERINO J,et al.Validity of Framingham criteria as a clinical test for systolic heart failure[J].Rev Clin Esp,2006,206:495-498.

    [11]

    李艳红,任学军.心电图QRS-T夹角临床意义探讨[J].心肺血管病杂志,2010,29(3):254-256.

    [12]

    付研.急性心力衰竭进展与实践[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2010,19(8):789-794.

    [13]

    MADIAS J E.The resting electrocardiogram in the management of patients with congestive heart failure:established applications and new insights[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2007,30:123-128.

    [14]

    Madias J E.Why recording of an electrocardiogram should be required in every inpatient and outpatient encounter of patients with heart failure[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2011,34:963-967.

    [15]

    SELVARAJ S,ILKHANOFF L,BURKE M A,et al.Association of the frontal QRS-T angle with adverse cardiac remodeling,impaired left and right ventricular function,and worse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2014,27:74-82.

    [16]

    RAPOSEIRAS-ROUBIN S,VIRGOS-LAMELA A,BOUZAS-CRUZ N,et al.Usefulness of the QRS-T angle to improve long-term risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction[J].Am J Cardiol,2014,113:1312-1319.

    [17]

    GOTSMAN I,KEREN A,HELLMAN Y,et al.Usefulness of electrocardiographic frontal QRS-T angle to predict increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure[J].Am J Cardiol,2013,111:1452-1459.

    [18]

    KENTTA T,VIIK J,KARSIKAS M,et al.Postexercise recovery of the spatial QRS/T angle as a predictor of sudden cardiac death[J].Heart Rhythm,2012,9:1083-1089.

    [19]

    ARO A L,HUIKURI H V,TIKKANEN J T,et al.QRS-T angle as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in a middle-aged general population[J].Europace,2012,14:872-876.

    [20]

    LOWN M T,MUNYOMBWE T,HARRISON W,et al.Association of frontal QRS-T angle——age risk score on admission electrocardiogram with mortality in patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome[J].Am J Cardiol,2012,109:307-313.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  94
  • PDF下载数:  106
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2014-11-23

目录