医院与社区综合干预模式对老年高血压病患者尿肌酐白蛋白比值及预后影响研究

程波; 刘敏; 朱磊; 杨明; 吴虹; 蒋伟; 庄红; 艾丽; 张苏川

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2017.08.006

医院与社区综合干预模式对老年高血压病患者尿肌酐白蛋白比值及预后影响研究

- 1 江汉大学附属医院综合Ⅲ科(武汉, 430015);
- 2 江汉大学附属医院心内科
基金项目:
武汉市卫计委立项课题 (No:WG15D21)

详细信息

通讯作者: 刘敏,E-mail:164324908@qq.com

中图分类号: R544.1

收稿日期: 2017-03-02

Study on the effect of comprehensive intervention model of hospital and community on UACR and prognosis of elderly patients with hypertension

- 1 Department of Integrated;Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430015, China;
- 2 Department of Cardiology;Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University

More Information

Corresponding author: LIU Min, E-mail: 164324908@qq.com

Received Date: 02 March 2017

摘要

摘要: 目的:探讨医院与社区综合干预模式对老年高血压病患者尿白蛋白肌酐比值(UACR)及预后的影响。方法:以某社区老年高血压病患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组各120例。两组患者研究期间均由我院专科医生制定及调整治疗方案,所有患者每月门诊随诊1次;观察组同时由社区医师每周随访1次。随访24个月后,比较两组患者血压达标率、UACR、左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、室间隔厚度(IVS)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)及再住院率。结果:随访12、18、24个月时,观察组的血压达标率分别为60.83%、72.16%、92.17%,明显高于对照组35.00%、54.87%、72.19%,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访12及24个月时,观察组UACR显著低于对照组,随访24个月时对照组UACR转阳率(18.30%)明显高于观察组(9.17%),差异均具有显著性(P<0.05)。随访12及24个月时,观察组LVESV、LVEDV及LVEF水平显著优于对照组;随访24个月时,观察组的IVS水平显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访24个月时,观察组MACCE事件发生率及再入院率显著低于对照组,其中脑血管不良事件发生率及心血管不良事件发生率均显著低于对照组,差异均具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:医院与社区综合干预模式可显著延缓老年高血压病患者的靶器官损害,改善老年高血压病患者的预后,是一种值得临床借鉴推广的老年高血压病防治模式。
- 综合干预 /
- 老年高血压病 /
- 尿肌酐白蛋白比值 /
- 预后
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention on the prognosis of elderly patients with hypertension. Method: The elderly patients with hypertension were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 120 cases in each group. During the study period, all patients were followed up 1 times per month by our hospital specialist, while the observation group was followed up by the community physician for a period of 1 week. After 24 months of follow-up, compared with the UACR, the standard rate of blood pressure and renal function, left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), interventricular septum (IVS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and the rate of hospitalization in two groups. Result: During the follow-up of 12, 18, and 24 months, the blood pressure compliance rate of the observation group were 60.83%, 72.16%, and 92.17% respectively, and higher than the control group 35%, 54.87%, 72.19% significantly. The difference was significant statistically (P＜0.05). After 12 and 24 months of follow-up, the UACR values of the observation group were lower than those in the control group significantly. After 24 months of follow-up, the UACR conversion rate (18.3%) in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (9.17%), and the difference was significant (P＜0.05). After 12 and 24 months of follow-up, the levels of LVESV, LVEDV and LVEF in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group, and the level of IVS in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group after the follow-up of 24 months. The difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); After 24 months of follow-up, the incidence rate of MACCE and readmission rate in observation group was significantly lower than the control group. The incidence of cerebrovascular adverse events and adverse cardiovascular events were significantly lower than the control group, and the difference was significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion: The hospital and community comprehensive intervention can significantly reduce target organ damage and improve the prognosis in elderly hypertensive patients.
- comprehensive intervention /
- elderly hypertension /
- urinary albumin creatinine ratio /
- prognosis

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	付涛.人口老龄化与中国的养老压力[J].现代经济信息, 2010, 6 (2):156-156.
[2]	中国高血压防治指南修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南2010[J].中华高血压杂志, 2011, 19 (8):701-702.
[3]	贾蓓, 张志辰, 张允岭, 等.北京市丰台区部分社区脑卒中高危人群高血压患者用药现状调查[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2015, 31 (2):172-175.
[4]	庄美兰, 陈吕.医院联合社区综合管理防治原发性高血压的效果分析[J].医学综述, 2015, 21 (6):1116-1118.
[5]	钟俊涛, 蓝业平, 蒋宏辉, 等.医院-社区综合管理模式对高血压患者控压效果及服药依从性的影响[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2014, 22 (7):35-36.
[6]	胡世雄, 江高峰.尿微量白蛋白 (UmAlb) 与肌酐 (Cr) 比值 (UACR) 对老年原发性高血压早期肾损伤损伤诊断价值分析[J].中国卫生标准管理, 2016, 7 (1):156-157.
[7]	王强生.尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值、血清肌酐和血清胱抑素C对老年高血压患者早期肾损害的诊断价值研究[D].江苏, 苏州大学, 2016:1-5.
[8]	National Kidney Foundation.K/DOQI clinical Practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease:evaluation, classification, and stratification.Kidney Disease Outcome Quality initiative[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2002, 39 (2Suppl 1):S1-266.
[9]	KI-CHUL S, SEUNGHO R, JONG-YOUNG L, et al.Rine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio Below 30 mg/g is a Predictor of Incident Hypertension and Cardiovascular Mortality[J].J Am Heart Assoc, 2016, 5:e003245.
[10]	中国老年高血压干预共识专家委员会.中国老年高血压干预专家共识 (上)[J].心脑血管病防治, 2009, 9 (1):1-4.
[11]	SAYDAH S H, PAVKOV M E, ZHANG C, et al.Albuminuria prevalence in first morning void compared with previous random urine from adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010[J].Clin Chem, 2013, 59:675-683.
[12]	冯琼, 吴朝霞, 潘磊, 等.氨氯地平联合二甲双胍治疗中国人群肥胖型高血压效果的meta分析[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2015, 31 (12):1314-1318.
[13]	周书明, 尹秋生.综合干预对老年高血压患者血压达标的影响[J].中华高血压杂志, 2007, 15 (7):595-596.
[14]	王苹.综合干预对社区高血压患者心血管健康行为改善情况研究[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2016, 8 (2), 200-202.
[15]	李西霞, 林云虹.高血压健康促进管理模式综合干预效果评价[J].中国公共卫生, 2010, 26 (3), 344-345.