Analysis of factors related to functional ischemia based on FFR and its diagnostic value
-
摘要: 目的:探究冠状动脉(冠脉)功能性缺血的相关因素,通过联合危险因素构建预测模型,并分析其对于功能性缺血的诊断价值。方法:连续、回顾性筛选接受冠脉造影,提示血管直径狭窄程度50%~75%,并同时行血流储备分数(FFR)检查的冠心病临界病变患者,经过排除后入选患者277例,其中男176例,女101例。以FFR<0.80视为血管存在功能性缺血的界限,通过单因素与多因素Logistic回归分析筛选与功能性缺血相关的预测因子,利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价危险因素所构建的多元Logistic方程对于功能性缺血的预测价值。结果:男性、病变血管数及红细胞分布宽度(RDW)与血管功能性缺血存在显著性相关,通过三者构建的多元Logistic方程ROC曲线下面积AUC=0.747,P<0.001,95%置信区间(CI)为0.682~0.813,且该模型优于单独使用RDW用于预测功能性缺血,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在冠心病临界病变中,男性、病变血管数及红细胞分布宽度为功能性缺血的独立预测因子,所构建的多元Logistic方程对于指导血运重建具有一定价值。Abstract: Objective: We explore the factors associated with functional ischemia, constructed a predictive model by combining risk factors, and analyzed its diagnostic value for functional ischemia.Method: Consecutive patients who underwent FFR measurement for intermediate lesions (50~75% stenosis on coronary angiography) were retrospectively screened and 277 patients including 176 males and 101 females were enrolled in this study.A FFR value <0.80 was defined as functional ischemia.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to investigate the association between functional ischemia and clinical variables.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to evaluate the predictive value of the multivariate logistic equation for functional ischemia.Result: Male gender, number of stenotic vessels and red blood cell distribution (RDW) were significantly correlated with functional ischemia.The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the multivariate logistic equation was 0.747, P<0.001 and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were 0.682 to 0.813.Conclusion: Our study has shown that male gender, number of stenotic vessels and RDW are independent predictors of functional ischemia in patients with intermediate lesions.The multivariate logistic equation has certain value for guiding revascularization.
-
Key words:
- coronary artery disease /
- fractional flow reserve /
- intermediate lesions
-
[1] Pijls NH, Van SON JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al.Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty[J].Circulation, 1993, 87(4):1354-1367.
[2] PijlS NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease:2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 56(3):177-184.
[3] Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al.2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization:The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)[J].Eur Heart J, 2014, 35(37):2541-2619.
[4] Gotberg M, Cook C M, Sen S, et al.The Evolving Future of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve[J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(11):1379-1402.
[5] De Bruyne B, Pijls N H, Kalesan B, et al.Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease[J].N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(11):991-1001.
[6] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南2010[J].中华心血管病杂志, 2011, 39(7):579-616.
[7] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J].中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(1):4-67.
[8] Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, Bruyne BD, et al.Angio-[CM(72mm] graphic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study:Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 55(25):2816-2821.
[9] 刁佳宇, 叶红华, 陈晓敏.血流储备分数在评估冠状动脉病变及指导介入治疗的荟萃分析[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2012, 28(10):787-793.
[10] Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Han S, et al.Sex differences in the visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 6(6):562-568.
[11] 张英, 刘健, 王伟民, 等.NVDA评分对预测冠状动脉临界病变最小管腔面积价值的研究[J].中国循环杂志, 2016, 31(3):240-244.
[12] Bujak K, Wasilewski J, Osadnik T, et al.The Prognostic Role of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Coronary Artery Disease:A Review of the Pathophysiology[J].Dis Markers, 2015, 2015:824624.
[13] Tziakas D, Chalikias G, Grapsa A, et al.Red blood cell distribution width:a strong prognostic marker in cardiovascular disease:is associated with cholesterol content of erythrocyte membrane[J].Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2012, 51(4):243-254.
[14] Kalay N, Aytekin M, Kaya MG, et al.The relationship between inflammation and slow coronary flow:increased red cell distribution width and serum uric acid levels[J].Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars, 2011, 39(6):463-468.
[15] Patel KV, Mohanty JG, Kanapur UB, et al.Association of the red cell distribution width with red blood cell deformability[J].Adv Exp Med Biol, 2013, 765:211-216.
[16] 方士杰, 张强, 杨丽红, 等.MPV、PDW、RDW与冠心病的相关性研究[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2019, 35(01):15-19.
[17] 糜家睿, 刘志敏, 杨绳文, 等.红细胞分布宽度对心脏再同步化治疗患者预后的风险评估作用[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2016, 32(2):170-174.
[18] Acikgoz SK, Acar B, Aydin S, et al.Red Cell Distribution Width Can Predict the Significance of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions[J].Med Princ Pract, 2016, 25(1):31-35.
计量
- 文章访问数: 228
- PDF下载数: 92
- 施引文献: 0