Value of ACEF score in evaluating one-year prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients
-
摘要: 目的:评价接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入手术(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分对于患者术后1年预后的预测价值。方法:回顾性纳入2014年6月-2018年6月于苏州大学附属第一医院行PCI术的STEMI患者754例,根据患者1年内是否出现主要不良心血管事件(MACE)分为病例组185例及对照组569例。收集患者的临床资料,计算ACEF评分,根据三分位数将患者分成低危组(ACEF评分≤1.09,258例)、中危组(1.09<ACEF评分≤1.46,248例)和高危组(ACEF评分>1.46,248例),比较3组患者1年内MACE的发生情况。结果:ACEF评分是STEMI患者1年内MACE发生的独立危险因素,与其他指标相比,其预测价值更高(AUC=0.784,95%CI:0.748~0.820,P=0.000)。高危组患者平均年龄更大,发生心房颤动、心力衰竭、室性心动过速以及心室颤动的比例更高(均P<0.05)。ACEF评分越高,术后1年内发生MACE的风险越高(log-rank P=0.000),发生时间越早。结论:ACEF评分对STEMI患者PCI术后1年预后有着良好的预测价值。
-
关键词:
- ST段抬高型心肌梗死 /
- 年龄、肌酐和射血分数评分 /
- 预后
Abstract: Objective:To investigate the value of age,creatinine,and ejection fraction(ACEF) scores in evaluating one-year prognosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).Method:A total of 754 patients with STEMI who underwent PCI in The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from June 2014 to June 2018 were retrospectively included.They were divided into case group(n=185) and control group(n=569) based on whether patients had major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) within one year.Then we collected clinical data of patients,calculated the ACEF score,and divided patients into low-risk group(ACEF score≤1.09,n=258),intermediate-risk group(1.09<ACEF score≤1.46,n=248) and high-risk group(ACEF score>1.46,n=248).The incidence of MACE within one year was compared among the three groups.Result:The ACEF score was an independent risk factor of MACE within one year in STEMI patients,and its predictive value was better than other indicators(AUC=0.784,95%CI:0.748-0.820,P=0.000).The average age of patients in the high-risk group was the oldest,the proportion of atrial fibrillation,heart failure,ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation was also the highest(all P<0.05).The higher the ACEF score,the higher the risk of MACE within one year after PCI(log-rank P=0.000),and the earlier the onset.Conclusion:The ACEF score has a great predictive value for one-year prognosis in STEMI patients after PCI. -
-
[1] Ibanez B,James S,Agewall S,et al.2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation[J].Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed),2017,70(12):1082.
[2] Roffi M,Patrono C,Collet JP,et al.2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation[J].Kardiol Pol.2015,73(12):1207-1294.
[3] Ranucci M,Castelvecchio S,Conte M,et al.The easier,the better:age,creatinine,ejection fraction score for operative mortality risk stratification in a series of 29,659 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2011,142(3):581-586.
[4] Barili F,Pacini D,Grossi C,et al.Reliability of new scores in predicting perioperative mortality after mitral valve surgery[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2014,147(3):1008-1012.
[5] Stahli BE,Wischnewsky MB,Jakob P,et al.Predictive value of the age,creatinine,and ejection fraction (ACEF) score in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,270:7-13.
[6] Synetos A,Georgiopoulos G,Pylarinou V,et al.Comparison of prognostic risk scores after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Int J Cardiol,2017,230:482-487.
[7] Levine GN,Bates ER,Blankenship JC,et al.2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2016,67(10):1235-1250.
[8] Deng J,Wang X,Shi Y,et al.Prognostic value of the age,creatinine,and ejection fraction score for non-infarct-related chronic total occlusion revascularization after primary percutaneous intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients:A retrospective study[J].J Interv Cardiol,2018,31(1):33-40.
[9] 尉驰,闫浩东,徐力红,等.ACEF评分对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后6个月内再次血运重建的评估价值[J].中国心血管杂志,2019,24(6):501-506.
[10] Knott KD,Seraphim A,Augusto JB,et al.The prognostic significance of quantitative myocardial perfusion:An artificial intelligence based approach using perfusion mapping[J].Circulation,2020,141(16):1282-1291.
[11] Janella BL,Campos CM,Caixeta A,et al.Assessment of long-term mortality in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous intervention:comparison of multiple anatomical and clinical prognostic risk scores[J].EuroIntervention,2017,13(10):1177-1184.
[12] Reindl M,Reinstadler SJ,Tiller C,et al.ACEF score adapted to ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients:The ACEF-STEMI score[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,264:18-24.
[13] 高国峰,周林丽,张冬,等.ACEF评分在中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的预测价值研究[J].中国循环杂志,2019,34(11):1047-1054.
[14] Lee JH,Bae MH,Yang DH,et al.Prognostic value of the age,creatinine,and ejection fraction score for 1-year mortality in 30-day survivors who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2015,115(9):1167-1173.
[15] Sbrocchi AJ,Denlinger CE.Occam's razor:What is the best approach for a lobectomy?[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2018,156(1):363-364.
[16] Gao S,Liu Q,Ding X,et al.Predictive value of the combination of age,creatinine,and ejection fraction score and diabetes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Coron Artery Dis,2020,31(2):109-117.
[17] Gao G,Zhang D,Song C,et al.Integrating the residual SYNTAX score to improve the predictive ability of the age,creatinine,and ejection fraction (ACEF) score for cardiac mortality in percutaneous coronary intervention patients[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2020,95 Suppl 1:534-541.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 118
- PDF下载数: 57
- 施引文献: 0
下载: