The effectiveness and safety of triple-branched stent graft and Sun’s procedure for Stanford A aortic dissection: a Meta-analysis
-
摘要: 目的:对比分析主动脉弓三分支覆膜支架手术与孙氏手术治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的临床效果。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Sicence、Cochrane Library英文数据库与万方、CNKI中文数据库,纳入建库至2020年2月对比三分支覆膜支架手术与孙氏手术重建Stanford A型夹层主动脉弓的临床研究。选取术中体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间、深低温停循环时间、术后30 d死亡率、截瘫、脑栓塞及急性肾衰竭发生率为评价指标,采用RevMan 5.3进行Meta分析。结果:纳入8篇队列研究,共391例患者(181例三分支术,210例孙氏术)。结果显示,与孙氏手术相比,三分支覆膜支架手术体外循环时间[SMD=-37.78,95%CI:(-66.34,-10.22),P=0.007]、主动脉阻断时间[SMD=-34.33,95%CI:(-61.62,-7.04),P=0.001]、深低温停循环时间[SMD=-12.10,95%CI:(-23.47,-0.73),P=0.004]较短。术后30 d死亡率、截瘫、脑栓塞及急性肾衰竭发生率无显著差异。结论:在Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术治疗中,相比于孙氏手术,三分支主动脉弓覆膜支架重建主动脉弓的早期临床效果满意。未来需随机对照试验进一步评价其远期临床效果。Abstract: Objective: To investigate and compare total aortic arch reconstruction's safety and effectiveness with triple-branched stent graft and Sun's procedure for Standford A aortic dissection. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database up to February 2020 to identify trials and these trials were about the comparison of two surgical methods for the reconstruction of Stanford type A dissection aortic arch. The time of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic occlusion and deep hypothermia circulatory arrest, 30-day mortality, the incidence of paralysis, cerebral embolism and acute renal failure were selected as evaluation indexes. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Result: Eight clinical control trials were included, involving 391 cases(181 cases with triple-branched stent graft and 210 cases with Sun's procedure). The results showed that compared with Sun's procedure, the triple-branched stent graft operation significantly reduced the cardiopulmonary bypass time [SMD =-37.78, 95%CI:(-66.34,-10.22), P = 0.007], aortic occlusion time [SMD =-34.33, 95%CI:(-61.62,-7.04), P = 0.001], deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time [SMD =-12.10, 95%CI:(-23.47,-0.73), P = 0.004], and there was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality, paralysis, cerebral embolism and acute renal failure in perioperative between the two groups.Conclusion: Compared with Sun'S procedure, total arch repair with open triple-branched stent graft placement for Stanford A aortic dissection has the same early clinical effect. However, this technique's safety and efficacy and its long-term clinical effect need to be further verified by randomized controlled trials.
-
Key words:
- aortic dissection /
- triple-branched stent graft /
- Sun's procedure
-
-
[1] El-Hamamsy I,Ouzounian M,Demers P,et al.State-of-the-art surgical management of acute type A aortic dissection[J].Can J Cardiol,2016,32(1):100-109.
[2] Evangelista A,Isselbacher EM,Bossone E,et al.Insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection:A 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research[J].Circulation,2018,137(17):1846-1860.
[3] Czerny M,Schmidli J,Adler S,et al.Editor's choice-current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch:An expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS)& the European Society for Vascular Surgery(ESVS)[J].Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2019,57(2):165-198.
[4] 常谦,田川.主动脉弓杂交修复技术[J].中华血管外科杂志,2018,3(1):12-14.
[5] 刘宁宁,孙立忠.主动脉弓部重建相关问题的研究进展[J].中华外科杂志,2017,55(4):311-315.
[6] Dai XF,Chen LW,Wu XJ,et al.Total aortic arch reconstruction with triple-branched stent graft or hemiarch replacement for acute debakey type i aortic dissection:Five-years experience with 93 patients[J].J Card Surg,2015,30(10):749-755.
[7] 程凤,陈庆良,姜楠,等.孙氏手术与三分支主动脉弓覆膜支架治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的效果比较[J].天津医药,2016,44(8):951-954.
[8] 李猛智,方刚,张正聪,等.孙氏手术与联合三分支支架血管术中置入治疗急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层对比[J].中国心血管病研究,2013,11(12):960-965.
[9] 李明,张总刚,刘筠,等.三分支主动脉弓覆膜支架与传统手术治疗A型主动脉夹层的效果比较[J].中国体外循环杂志,2014,(4):241-244.
[10] 申运华,严中亚,章庆春,等.三分支覆膜支架重建主动脉弓部手术治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的疗效[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(8):676-680.
[11] 唐滔,申康军,唐浩,等.新型三分支型主动脉弓腔内覆膜支架在DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层中的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(7):706-710.
[12] 王平凡,李潮,陈良万,等.新型三分支主动脉弓覆膜支架治疗Ⅰ型主动脉夹层的研究[J].医药论坛杂志,2009,30(21):1-2,5.
[13] 熊师.三分支支架治疗急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层疗效的临床研究[D].南京:东南大学,2017.
[14] Di Marco L,Leone A,Murana G,et al.Acute type A aortic dissection:Rationale and outcomes of extensive repair of the arch and distal aorta[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,267:145-149.
[15] 王石雄,王炜,柳德斌,等.降主动脉“逆行”去分支与主动脉腔内修复术杂交治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2017,24(10):821-822.
[16] Murashita T,Matsuda H,Domae K,et al.Less invasive surgical treatment for aortic arch aneurysms in high-risk patients:a comparative study of hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair and conventional total arch replacement[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2012,143(5):1007-1013.
[17] Liu P,Chang Q,Qian X,et al.Early and mid-term results after hybrid total arch repair of DeBakey type I dissection without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2016,23(4):608-615.
[18] 陈良万,戴小福,卢琳,等.三分支支架血管在急性A型主动脉夹层全主动脉弓重建术中的应用[J].中国心血管病研究,2009,7(12):890-893.
[19] Chen LW,Dai XF,Lu L,et al.Extensive primary repair of the thoracic aorta in acute type a aortic dissection by means of ascending aorta replacement combined with open placement of triple-branched stent graft:early results[J].Circulation,2010,122(14):1373-1378.
[20] 华菲,沈振亚,余云生,等.主动脉弓三分支覆膜支架在Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层外科治疗中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(8):720-723.
[21] 潘俊,李庆国,周庆,等.分支覆膜支架血管治疗Standford A型夹层[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(1):88-89.
[22] Jakanani GC,Adair W.Frequency of variations in aortic arch anatomy depicted on multidetector CT[J].Clin Radiol,2010,65(6):481-487.
[23] Giannopoulos AA,Mitsouras D,Yoo SJ,et al.Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases[J].Nat Rev Cardiol,2016,13(12):701-718.
[24] 李晓莉,何平,张大勇,等.3D打印辅助复杂胸主动脉血管病变分支支架腔内修复手术治疗的临床分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2020,27(2):223-227.
[25] 杨探,廖斌,兰永树,等.三分支覆膜支架行主动脉弓重建治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层效果的临床随访[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2019,26(9):933-935.
[26] 严亮亮,陈银海,陈良万.三分支支架血管重建主动脉弓的中远期效果[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(33):32-35.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 201
- PDF下载数: 208
- 施引文献: 0
下载: