峰值应变离散度评价心脏再同步治疗后左室同步性及心功能变化

熊倩; 郑志伟; 安亚平; 谭静; 吴强; 俞杉

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2021.09.014

峰值应变离散度评价心脏再同步治疗后左室同步性及心功能变化

- 1. 贵州省人民医院心内科(贵阳, 550002);
- 2. 贵州省人民医院心内科心功能室
基金项目:
贵州省科技基金重点项目(No:黔科合基础2016-1410)

详细信息

通讯作者: 俞杉,E-mail:yusha1218@126.com

中图分类号: R541.6

收稿日期: 2021-03-14

Evaluation of the left ventricular synchronism and cardiac function after cardiac resynchronization therapy with peak strain discrete

- 1. Department of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, China;
- 2. Cardiac Function Department, Department of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital

More Information

Corresponding author: YU Shan, E-mail: yusha1218@126.com

Received Date: 14 March 2021

摘要

摘要: 目的:本研究旨在探讨应用二维斑点追踪成像(2D-STI)评价慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者心脏再同步治疗(CRT)术后左室同步性及心功能的变化。方法:入选2019年1月—2019年12月符合CTR适应证的CHF患者共20例,运用2D-STI测量患者术前、术后左心室相应17个节段收缩期纵向峰值应变(LS)及纵向峰值应变达峰时间(TTPLS),并绘制纵向峰值应变-时间曲线,以评价心功能变化;同时,计算各节段TTPLS的标准差(PSD)、左心室纵向应变达峰时间极差值(TTPLSR)及左心室不同步节段个数(LVDSN),以评价左室同步性变化。结果:与术前比较,患者术后心尖两腔心、心尖四腔心、左室长轴切面及左室整体LS均明显升高[分别为(-3.5±2.9)%∶(-5.5±3.0)%,(-2.3±2.2)%∶(-5.2±4.1)%,(-3.4±2.6)%∶(-5.7±2.7)%,(-3.0±1.7)%∶(-5.6±3.0)%,均P<0.05]。PSD、TTPLSR、LVDSN在术后均有明显改善[(176.2±26.2) ms∶(90.0±46.2) ms,(530.5±102.6) ms∶(222.8±69.0) ms,(13.3±2.1)个∶(7.0±2.6)个,均P<0.05]。PSD、TTPLSR均与LVEF呈负相关(r=-0.855,r=-0.746,均P<0.05)。结论:2D-STI可直观、准确评估CHF患者CRT术后心功能和左室同步性;PSD有望成为评价CRT患者左室同步性变化的新参数。
- 斑点追踪显像 /
- 慢性心力衰竭 /
- 心脏再同步化治疗 /
- 心功能 /
- 左室同步性
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the changes of left ventricular synchronism and cardiac function after cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure(CHF) by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging(2 D-STI).Methods: Twenty CHF patients who fulfilled the indications of CRT from January to December, 2019 were enrolled in the study. Longitudinal peak strain(LS) and longitudinal peak strain peak time(TTPLS) of the corresponding 17 segments of the left ventricle were measured by 2 D-STI preoperatively and postoperatively. Longitudinal peak strain-time curves were drawn to evaluate the changes of cardiac function. The standard deviation of TTPLS(PSD) for each segment, left ventricular time to peak longitudinal strain range(TTPLSR) and left ventricular dyssynchrony segments number(LVDSN) were calculated to evaluate left ventricular synchronism.Results: Compared with the preoperative parameters, the LS in two-chamber and four-chamber heart of the apex, the left ventricular long axis sections and global longitudinal peak strain(GLS) were significantly increased(-3.5±2.9% vs-5.5±3.0%,-2.3±2.2% vs-5.2±4.1%,-3.4±2.6% vs-5.7±2.7%,-3.0±1.7% vs-5.6±3.0%, P<0.05). PSD, TTPLSR and LVDSN improved significantly(176.2±26.2 ms vs 90.0±46.2 ms, 530.5±102.6 ms vs 222.8±69.0 ms, 13.3±2.1 vs 7.0±2.6 ms, all P<0.05). Both PSD and TTPLSR were negatively correlated with LVEF(r=-0.855, r=-0.746, all P<0.05).Conclusion: 2 D-STI can evaluate cardiac function and left ventricular synchronism of CHF patients after CRT therapy directly and accurately. PSD is a new parameter to evaluate the changes of left ventricular synchronism in patients with CRT.
- speckle tracking imaging /
- chronic heart failure /
- cardiac resynchronization therapy /
- cardiac function /
- left ventricular synchronism

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	O'Brien T,Park MS,Youn JC,et al.The past,present and future of cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Korean Circ J,2019,49(5):384-399.
[2]	Osmanska J,Hawkins NM,Toma M,et al.Eligibility for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients hospitalized with heart failure[J].ESC Heart Fail,2018,5(4):668-674.
[3]	中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病学杂志编辑委员会.2017中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2017,42(2):98-122.
[4]	To AC,Benatti RD,Sato K,et al.Strain-time curve analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy:Insight into the pathophysiology of responders vs.non-responders[J].Cardiovasc Ultrasound,2016,14:14.
[5]	Jeng GS,Zontak M,Parajuli N,et al.Efficient two-pass 3-D speckle tracking for ultrasound imaging[J].IEEE Access,2018,6:17415-17428.
[6]	Legong DP,Hoogslag GE,Piers SR,et al.The relationship between time from myocardial infarction,left ventricular dyssynchrony,and the risk for ventricular arrhythmia:speckle-tracking echocardiographic analysis[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2015,28(4):470-477.
[7]	李光源,马春燕,王永槐,等.二维斑点追踪成像评价QRS时限对射血分数正常的左束支传导阻滞患者左心室功能及同步性的影响[J].中国医学影像技术,2017,33(3):325-329.
[8]	王媛媛,张连仲,刘琳,等.峰值应变离散度评价原发性高血压患者左心室收缩同步性[J].中国超声医学杂志,2019,3(7):608-611.
[9]	黑晶晶,袁建军,魏常华,等.峰值应变离散度评价维持性血液透析患者左心室收缩同步性[J].中国医学影像技术,2018,34(3):340-344.
[10]	Mora V,Roldán I,Romero E,et al.Comprehensive assessment of left ventricular myocardial function by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography[J].Cardiovasc Ultrasound,2018,16(1):16.
[11]	樊晓寒,陈柯萍,严激,等.选择心脏再同步治疗起搏器或除颤器的影响因素分析[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2017,21(1):31-36.
[12]	Paoletti PA,Bartolini S,Pieragnoli P,et al.CHADS2 and CHAD2DS2-VASc scores to predict morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients candicates cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Europace,2014,16(1):71-80.
[13]	赵烨婧,柳景华.二尖瓣反流:预测心脏再同步治疗效果的新指标[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(23):1803-1805.
[14]	张晶,肖杨杰,任卫东等.斑点追踪成像评价心脏淀粉样变性患者左心室心肌分层应变[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(4):268-272.
[15]	邢长洋,袁丽君,张宇新,等.二维斑点追踪技术对左心室收缩运动不同成分的分解研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2019,28(5):397-400.
[16]	王洁,孙婷婷,齐丽彤,等.左心室整体纵向应变对慢性心力衰竭患者预后的预测价值[J].临床心血管病学杂志,2019,35(10):912-916.
[17]	Haugaa KH,Dejgaard LA.Global longitudinal strain:ready for clinical use and guideline implementation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2018,71(18):1958-1959.
[18]	谷春红,魏常华,袁建军,等.应用峰值应变离散度评价原发性高血压患者左心室纵向收缩同步性[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2018,26(8):585-589.