心肌做功在糖尿病患者伴有左室重构中的应用

李坤, 李春梅. 心肌做功在糖尿病患者伴有左室重构中的应用[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(6): 484-488. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.06.011
引用本文: 李坤, 李春梅. 心肌做功在糖尿病患者伴有左室重构中的应用[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(6): 484-488. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.06.011
LI Kun, LI Chunmei. Myocardial work predicts left ventricular dysfunction risk in diabetes mellitus[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(6): 484-488. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.06.011
Citation: LI Kun, LI Chunmei. Myocardial work predicts left ventricular dysfunction risk in diabetes mellitus[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(6): 484-488. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.06.011

心肌做功在糖尿病患者伴有左室重构中的应用

  • 基金项目:
    四川省科技厅重点研发项目(No:2020YFS0245)
详细信息

Myocardial work predicts left ventricular dysfunction risk in diabetes mellitus

More Information
  • 目的 本研究旨在探讨心肌做功在糖尿病(DM)伴有左室重构患者早期左心室功能障碍中的应用价值。方法 本研究最终纳入45例健康受试者作为正常对照组,51例DM患者为DM组。DM组被进一步分为左室几何构型正常组(RWT < 0.42,25例)和左室重构组(RWT≥0.42,26例)。所有研究对象均接受常规超声心动图和二维斑点追踪超声心动图检查,并使用GE Echo PAC分析软件获取左心室常规超声参数、应变参数及心肌做功参数:整体有效做功(GCW)、整体做功指数(GWI)、整体无效做功(GWW)、整体做功效率(GWE)等。结果 与正常对照组比较,DM组GCW、GWI、GWW、GWE、整体纵向应变(GLS)、峰值应变离散度(PSD)均受损(P< 0.05)。与正常对照组比较,左室几何构型正常组和左室重构组的GCW、GWI均减低,且在左室重构组受损明显(P< 0.05)。GWW、GWE、GLS、PSD在左室几何构型正常组与正常对照组之间差异无统计学意义,而与正常对照组相比,左室重构组的GCW、GWI、GWW、GWE、GLS、PSD受损(P< 0.05)。结论 左室心肌做功可以用于评估伴有左室重构的DM患者的左室心肌功能障碍,其能够为DM患者的亚临床左室收缩功能的评估提供更准确、更敏感的新指标。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  LVMW

    Figure 1.  LVMW

    表 1  入组患者的基线资料和常规超声参数比较

    Table 1.  Baseline characteristics and conventional echocardiographic parameters of enrolled patients X±S

    项目 正常对照组
    (45例)
    DM组
    (51例)
    左室几何构型正常组
    (25例)
    左室重构组
    (26例)
    年龄/岁 54.33±9.94 52.27±11.09 51.88±11.93 52.65±10.44
    男/女/例 22/23 24/27 12/13 12/14
    病程/年 NA 6.53±1.73 6.20±1.58 6.85±1.87
    HbA1c/% NA 6.96±2.41 6.37±3.12 8.16±2.822)
    LVEDD/mm 46.26±2.93 47.04±2.90 47.12±2.57 46.96±3.24
    PWDD/mm 8.76±0.89 9.61±0.961) 9.12±0.671) 10.08±0.981)2)
    RWT 0.38±0.04 0.41±0.051) 0.39±0.03 0.43±0.051)2)
    LVEDV/mL 107.76±9.47 109.84±8.18 114.28±7.57 108.46±8.64
    LVEF /% 66.60±4.11 64.14±3.78 63.92±3.17 64.27±3.67
    LVMI/(g·m-2) 95.80±7.51 102.53±8.271) 98.84±6.881) 106.08±8.041)2)
    E/Em 8.29±1.80 10.26±2.971) 8.87±2.13 11.59±3.091)2)
    与正常对照组比较,1)P < 0.05;与左室几何构型正常组比较,2)P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  DM组和正常对照组LVMW及GLS、PSD参数比较

    Table 2.  LVMW、GLS and PSD parameters of enrolled patients X±S

    参数 正常对照组
    (45例)
    DM组
    (51例)
    左室正常几何构型组
    (25例)
    左室重构组
    (26例)
    GCW/mmHg% 2011.36±308.85 1630.59±306.901) 1855.16±209.581) 1414.65±217.451)
    GWW/mmHg% 85.29±47.36 128.61±48.871) 101.04±42.59 155.12±39.301)
    GWE/% 95.88±2.40 92.33±3.571) 94.79±2.29 89.97±2.921)
    GWI/mmHg% 1776.33±316.44 1554.76±244.061) 1637.68±280.421) 1475.04±173.661)
    GLS/% -20.02±2.23 -18.65±3.011) -19.36±3.10 -17.96±2.811)
    PSD/ms 33.45±5.27 41.89±10.031) 36.77±6.07 46.82±10.681)
    与正常对照组比较,1)P < 0.05;与左室几何构型正常组比较,2)P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Authors/Task Force Members, Rydén L, Grant PJ, et al. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes(EASD)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(39): 3035-3087. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht108

    [2]

    Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2022, 183: 109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119

    [3]

    Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Kollia P, et al. Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Diabetes: An Update[J]. Curr Cardiol Rev, 2020, 16(4): 266-274.

    [4]

    Jung CH, Mok JO. Recent Updates on Vascular Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[J]. Endocrinol Metab(Seoul), 2020, 35(2): 260-271. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.2.260

    [5]

    Leung M, Wong VW, Hudson M, et al. Impact of Improved Glycemic Control on Cardiac Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 9(3): e003643.

    [6]

    de Simone G, Gottdiener JS, Chinali M, et al. Left ventricular mass predicts heart failure not related to previous myocardial infarction: the Cardiovascular Health Study[J]. Eur Heart J, 2008, 29(6): 741-747. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm605

    [7]

    Lustosa RP, Fortuni F, van der Bijl P, et al. Changes in Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Indices and Stunning Detection 3 Months After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2021, 157: 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.012

    [8]

    Liu FZ, Wang XL, Zhang CQ. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular myocardial work in chronic kidney disease patients by a novel non-invasive pressure-strain loop analysis method[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2021, 37(5): 1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02132-9

    [9]

    Wang Q, Tan K, Xia H, et al. Left ventricular structural alterations are accompanied by subclinical systolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with concomitant hyperlipidemia: An analysis based on 3D speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. Echocardiography, 2018, 35(7): 965-974. doi: 10.1111/echo.13858

    [10]

    American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022[J]. Diabetes Care, 2022, 45(Suppl 1): S17-S38.

    [11]

    温德惠, 赵艳杰, 郑英娟, 等. 三维斑点追踪技术评价2型糖尿病合并颈动脉斑块患者左心室收缩功能的研究[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2019, 35(10): 934-939. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXB201910015.htm

    [12]

    Kalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction[J]. Heart, 2014, 100(21): 1673-1680. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305538

    [13]

    Konstam MA, Abboud FM. Ejection Fraction: Misunderstood and Overrated(Changing the Paradigm in Categorizing Heart Failure)[J]. Circulation, 2017, 135(8): 717-719. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025795

    [14]

    Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2015, 28(2): 183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.003

    [15]

    Sahiti F, Morbach C, Henneges C, et al. Dynamics of Left Ventricular Myocardial Work in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure[J]. J Card Fail, 2021, 27(12): 1393-1403. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.07.004

    [16]

    Butcher SC, Lustosa RP, Abou R, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular myocardial work index in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2022, 23(5): 699-707. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab096

    [17]

    Clemmensen TS, Eiskjær H, Ladefoged B, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular myocardial work indices in cardiac amyloidosis[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2021, 22(6): 695-704. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa097

    [18]

    Kostyukevich MV, van der Bijl P, Vo NM, et al. Regional Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Indices and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 13(8): 1852-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.006

    [19]

    Wang Q, Tan K, Xia H, et al. Left ventricular structural alterations are accompanied by subclinical systolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with concomitant hyperlipidemia: An analysis based on 3D speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. Echocardiography, 2018, 35(7): 965-974. doi: 10.1111/echo.13858

    [20]

    Li P, Zhang Y, Li L, et al. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function by non-invasive pressure-strain loop area in young male strength athletes[J]. Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 2020, 18(1): 45. doi: 10.1186/s12947-020-00227-w

    [21]

    Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, et al. A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work[J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(6): 724-733. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs016

  • 加载中

(1)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1173
  • PDF下载数:  410
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-02-13
刊出日期:  2022-06-13

目录