The predictive values of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve measured by CZT-SPECT in severe coronary stenosis
-
摘要: 目的 探讨基于碲锌镉(CZT)心脏专用SPECT(CZT-SPECT)测定心肌血流量(MBF)及血流储备(CFR)对冠状动脉(冠脉)重度狭窄的预测价值。方法 回顾性分析2021年1月—2021年8月于泰达国际心血管病医院完成CZT-SPECT检查的可疑或已确诊冠心病患者129例。本研究根据患者是否存在冠脉重度狭窄病变分为缺血组和对照组(冠脉重度狭窄病变的定义标准为血管直径≥2 mm且狭窄≥70%的病变)。绘制静息MBF(rMBF)、负荷MBF(sMBF)及CFR预测冠脉重度狭窄的受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线，并根据Youden指数确定截断值。结果 共纳入129例患者，平均年龄为(60.3±9.6)岁，男性占比51.2%，单支病变患者33例(25.6%)，双支病变患者22例(17.1%)，三支病变患者18例(13.9%)。分别在血管水平和患者水平进行分析，结果显示缺血组rMBF、sMBF、CFR均明显低于对照组(P < 0.01)，其中sMBF差异最为明显。绘制rMBF、sMBF、CFR预测冠脉重度狭窄的ROC曲线，结果显示rMBF、sMBF、CFR预测冠脉重度狭窄的AUC分别为0.641、0.808、0.781，截断值分别为0.735 mL·g-1·min-1、1.885 mL·g-1·min-1、2.185。有效预测指标为sMBF和CFR，灵敏度分别为78.5%、83.5%，特异度分别为88.2%、70.1%。结论 CZT-SPECT较容易获得rMBF、sMBF、CFR心肌定量血流参数，缺血组参数值明显低于对照组。sMBF和CFR预测心肌缺血表现出较好的诊断性能，其中sMBF最为突出。临床应用CFR进行缺血评估时，需要同时关注sMBF、rMBF绝对值。
-
关键词:
- 心肌血流量 /
- 冠状动脉血流储备 /
- 单光子发射型断层成像 /
- 心肌灌注显像
Abstract: Objective To investigate the predictive value of myocardial blood flow ( MBF) and blood flow reserve (CFR) based on cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) cardiac-specific SPECT (CZT-SPECT) for severe coronary stenosis.Methods From January 2021 to August 2021, 129 patients with suspected or confirmed coronary heart disease who completed the CZTSPECT examination in TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. In this study, patients were divided into the ischemia group and control group according to the presence or absence of severe coronary stenosis (the definition criteria for severe coronary stenosis were lesions with a vessel diameter ≥2 mm and stenosis ≥70%). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of resting MBF (rMBF), stress MBF (sMBF) and CFR for predicting severe coronary stenosis were drawn, and the cutoff value was selected according to the maximum Youden index.Results A total of 129 patients with an average age of (60.3±9.6) years, 51.2% males, were included. Among them, 33 patients (25.6%) with singlevessel disease, 22 (17.1%) with doublevessel disease, and 18 with threevessel disease. example (13.9%). The rMBF, sMBF, and CFR of the ischemia group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.01). The AUCs of rMBF, sMBF, and CFR for predicting severe coronary stenosis were 0 641, 0 808, and 0 781, and the cut-off values were 0 735 mL·g-1·min-1, 1 885 mL·g-1·min-1, 2 185, respectively. The effective predictors were sMBF and CFR, with sensitivities of 78.5% and 83.5%, and specificities of 88.2% and 70.1%, respectively. Conclusion CZT-SPECT could easily obtain rMBF, sMBF, and CFR, and the parameter values in the ischemic group were significantly lower than those in the control group. sMBF and CFR showed good diagnostic performance in predicting myocardial ischemia, of which sMBF was the most outstanding. -
-
图 3 rMBF、sMBF、CFR对预测冠脉重度狭窄的ROC曲线
Figure 3. ROC curves of rMBF, sMBF, and CFR for predicting severe coronary stenosis
表 1 缺血组和对照组MBF、CFR在血管水平及患者水平的比较
Table 1. MBF and CFR in the ischemic group and the control group
例(%), X±S 参数 缺血组 对照组 t P 血管水平(387支)/支 127 242 rMBF/(mL·min-1·g-1) 0.78±0.19 0.87±0.31 3.03 0.003 sMBF/(mL·min-1·g-1) 1.52±0.46 2.36±0.91 9.91 < 0.001 CFR 2.02±0.60 2.83±0.92 9.01 < 0.001 患者水平(129例)/例 73 56 rMBF-LAD/(mL·min-1·g-1) 0.81±0.16 0.88±0.09 3.03 0.003 sMBF-LAD/(mL·min-1·g-1) 1.76±0.59 2.52±0.89 5.75 < 0.001 CFR-LAD 2.24±0.72 2.87±0.96 4.22 < 0.001 rMBF-LCX/(mL·min-1·g-1) 0.79±0.20 0.87±0.18 2.07 0.040 sMBF-LCX/(mL·min-1·g-1) 1.70±0.58 2.26±0.88 4.31 < 0.001 CFR-LCX 2.20±0.73 2.68±0.89 3.36 0.001 rMBF-RCA/(mL·min-1·g-1) 0.79±0.14 0.87±0.58 2.48 0.014 sMBF-RCA/(mL·min-1·g-1) 1.88±0.77 2.67±1.11 4.67 < 0.001 CFR-RCA 2.40±0.77 3.17±1.04 4.82 < 0.001 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 CFR < 2.0在患者水平和血管水平预测冠脉重度狭窄的诊断价值
Table 2. Diagnostic value of CFR < 2.0 in predicting severe coronary stenosis
参数 血管水平(387支) 患者水平(129例) 灵敏度 56.9%(74/130) 57.5%(42/73) 特异度 87.9%(226/257) 85.7%(48/56) 阳性预测值 70.5%(74/105) 84.0%(42/50) 阴性预测值 80.1%(226/282) 60.8%(48/79) 准确性 77.5%(300/387) 69.8%(90/129)
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 rMBF、sMBF、CFR预测冠脉重度狭窄的ROC曲线相关参数
Table 3. ROC curve parameters of rMBF, sMBF and CFR for predicting severe coronary stenosis
指标 AUC 95%CI Youden指数 截断值 灵敏度/% 特异度/% rMBF 0.641 0.581~0.700 0.201 0.735 mL·min-1·g-1 64.7 56.4 sMBF 0.808 0.761~0.855 0.667 1.885 mL·min-1·g-1 78.5 88.2 CFR 0.781 0.732~0.831 0.536 2.185 83.5 70.1
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(5): 382-400. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.05.006
[2] Camici PG, Rimoldi OE. The clinical value of myocardial blood flow measurement[J]. J Nucl Med, 2009, 50(7): 1076-1087. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054478
[3] Cantoni V, Green R, Acampa W, et al. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2021, 28(2): 698-715. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01747-3
[4] Pang Z, Wang J, Li S, et al. Diagnostic analysis of new quantitative parameters of low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with CZT SPECT in the detection of suspected or known coronary artery disease[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2021, 37(1): 367-378. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01962-x
[5] Wang J, Li S, Chen W, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with CZT dynamic SPECT imaging for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparative study with traditional semi-quantitative evaluation[J]. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2021, 11(1): 56-67. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-728
[6] Shiraishi S, Tsuda N, Sakamoto F, et al. Clinical usefulness of quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve using CZT-SPECT for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with normal stress perfusion imaging[J]. J Cardiol, 2020, 75(4): 400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.09.006
[7] 陈炜佳, 姚康, 李晨光, 等. CZT-SPECT测定的冠状动脉血流储备对诊断冠心病的增益价值[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2019, 39(12): 714-719. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2019.12.003
[8] 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2020[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2021, 40(9): 885-889.
[9] Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(2): 128-137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112299
[10] Milzi A, Dettori R, Marx N, et al. Quantitative flow ratio(QFR)identifies functional relevance of non-culprit lesions in coronary angiographies of patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2021, 110(10): 1659-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01897-w
[11] Xu B, Tu S, Song L, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention(FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10317): 2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0
[12] 韩梦月, 谢锋, 吴天慧, 等. PET/SPECT核素心肌显像对存活心肌检测的研究进展[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2020, 36(9): 790-793. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2020.09.003
[13] 崔利军, 汪娇, 田刚, 等. 基于CZT-SPECT初探胸痛患者冠状动脉微血管疾病的发生风险及相关因素[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(5): 383-388. https://lcxxg.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.05.010
[14] Bailly M, Thibault F, Courtehoux M, et al. Myocardial Flow Reserve Measurement During CZT-SPECT Perfusion Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease Screening: Correlation With Clinical Findings and Invasive Coronary Angiography-The CFR-OR Study[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2021, 8: 691893.
[15] Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1974, 33(1): 87-94. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90743-7
[16] Naya M, Murthy VL, Taqueti VR, et al. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography[J]. J Nucl Med, 2014, 55(2): 248-255. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121442
[17] Sels JW, Tonino PA, Siebert U, et al. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME(Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)study[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4(11): 1183-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.008
[18] Fearon WF, Nishi T, De Bruyne B, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial(Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)[J]. Circulation, 2018, 137(5): 480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907
-
图(3)
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1267
- PDF下载数: 172
- 施引文献: 0