定量血流分数的相关研究及临床应用进展

李佳玮; 程兆云; 李正玉; 陈乾坤; 赵豪; 张世权

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.04.004

定量血流分数的相关研究及临床应用进展

- 郑州大学人民医院阜外华中心血管病医院河南省人民医院心脏中心(郑州，450003)
基金项目:
河南省科技攻关计划(No：SBGJ202101005)

详细信息

通讯作者: 程兆云，E-mail：chengzhy@zzu.edu.cn

中图分类号: R541.4

收稿日期: 2023-01-16

刊出日期: 2024-04-13

Related research and clinical application progress of quantitative flow ratio

- Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Heart Center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

More Information

Corresponding author: CHENG Zhaoyun, E-mail: chengzhy@zzu.edu.cn

Received Date: 16 January 2023

Publish Date: 13 April 2024

摘要

摘要: 近年来针对冠状动脉狭窄的功能学评估已引起国内外的广泛重视，血流储备分数(FFR)是目前公认的评估病变血管狭窄生理学意义的“金标准”，但因其操作复杂且使用的压力导丝存在创伤风险，故而难以广泛应用于临床。定量血流分数(QFR)与FFR在诊断效能上具有较高的一致性，且在临床实践中更加便捷、安全，能够弥补FFR的不足之处。本文基于国内外现有研究进展，对QFR的原理、临床应用、优势和限制进行阐述。
- 冠心病 /
- 定量血流分数 /
- 血流储备分数
Abstract: In recent years, the functional evaluation value of coronary artery stenosis has attracted extensive attention at home and abroad. Fractional flow reserve(FFR) is currently recognized as the "gold standard" to evaluate the physiological significance of pathological vessel stenosis, but it is difficult to be widely used in clinical practice due to its complex operation and the risk of trauma caused by the use of pressure guide wire. Quantitative flow ratio(QFR) has a high consistency with FFR in diagnostic efficacy, and is more convenient and safer in clinical practice, which can make up for the shortcomings of FFR. Based on the current research progress at home and abroad, this paper expounds the principle, clinical application, advantages and limitations of QFR.
- coronary heart disease /
- quantitative flow ratio /
- fractional flow reserve

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》编写组. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》要点解读[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2022, 27(4): 305-318. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIXG202304001.htm
[2]	Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): e18-e114.
[3]	Morris PD, van de Vosse FN, Lawford PV, et al. "Virtual"(Computed)fractional flow reserve: current challenges and limitations[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 8(8): 1009-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.006
[4]	王莽原, 宋江平, 胡盛寿. 血流储备分数的临床作用和优缺点及近期进展[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2015, 30(6): 599-601. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXH201506028.htm
[5]	袁兴东, 徐瑾, 钟长鸣, 等. 437例三磷酸腺苷不良反应的文献分析[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2016, 13(2): 94-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWJJ201602009.htm
[6]	Tu S, Echavarria-Pinto M, von Birgelen C, et al. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 8(4): 564-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.232
[7]	Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(19): 2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013
[8]	Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(25): 3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035
[9]	Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional flow reserve: The FAVOR Ⅱ Europe-Japan Study[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018, 7(14): 110.
[10]	Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, et al. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI Ⅱ Study(Wire-Free Functional Imaging Ⅱ)[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 11(3): e7107.
[11]	Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, Lauri F, et al. Influence of microcirculatory dysfunction on angiography-based functional assessment of coronary stenoses[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(8): 741-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.014
[12]	Zaleska M, Koltowski L, Maksym J, et al. Quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve mismatch-clinical and biochemical predictors of measurement discrepancy[J]. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej, 2019, 15(3): 301-307. http://www.xueshufan.com/publication/2977707010
[13]	Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessing myocardial ischemia in prior myocardial infarction[J]. Circ J, 2018, 82(3): 807-814. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949
[14]	Zhang R, Wang HY, Dou K, et al. Outcomes of functionally complete vs incomplete revascularization: insights from the FAVOR Ⅲ China Trial[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15(24): 2490-2502. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.014
[15]	Saito Y, Cristea E, Bouras G, et al. Long-term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 97(3): 431-436. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28804
[16]	Lee HJ, Mejia-Renteria H, Escaned J, et al. Prediction of functional results of percutaneous coronary interventions with virtual stenting and quantitative flow ratio[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 100(7): 1208-1217. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30451
[17]	Kirigaya H, Okada K, Hibi K, et al. Post-procedural quantitative flow ratio gradient and target lesion revascularization after drug-coated balloon or plain-old balloon angioplasty[J]. J Cardiol, 2022, 80(6): 511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.007
[18]	You W, Zhou Y, Wu Z, et al. Post-PCI quantitative flow ratio predicts 3-year outcome after rotational atherectomy in patients with heavily calcified lesions[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2022, 45(5): 558-566. doi: 10.1002/clc.23816
[19]	Lauri FM, Macaya F, Mejia-Renteria H, et al. Angiography-derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses in primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Euro Intervention, 2020, 15(18): e1594-e1601.
[20]	Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, et al. Quantitative flow ratio identifies nonculprit coronary lesions requiring revascularization in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(2): e6023.
[21]	De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Shanmuganathan M, et al. Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance as a novel, pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation in ST elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 36(8): 1395-1406.
[22]	Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, Choi KH, et al. Coronary microcirculation assessment using functional angiography: Development of a wire-free method applicable to conventional coronary angiograms[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 98(6): 1027-1037.
[23]	Kang Y, Hong H, Sohn SH, et al. The impact of fractional flow reserve on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis[J]. J Chest Surg, 2022, 55(6): 442-451.
[24]	Dowling C, Nelson AJ, Lim RY, et al. Quantitative flow ratio to predict long-term coronary artery bypass graft patency in patients with left main coronary artery disease[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2022, 38(12): 2811-2818.
[25]	Chen C, Zhao Y, Li W, et al. Relation of quantitative flow ratio with transit time coronary artery bypass graft flow measurement[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 975759.
[26]	Spitaleri G, Brugaletta S, Potena L, et al. Role of quantitative flow ratio in predicting future cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15(5): e11656.
[27]	Qi Q, Liu G, Yuan Z, et al. Quantitative flow ratio-guided surgical intervention in symptomatic myocardial bridging[J]. Cardiol J, 2020, 27(6): 685-692.