冠心病介入治疗进展

曾秋棠, 俞坤武. 冠心病介入治疗进展[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2025, 41(3): 176-180. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.003
引用本文: 曾秋棠, 俞坤武. 冠心病介入治疗进展[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2025, 41(3): 176-180. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.003
ZENG Qiutang, YU Kunwu. Progress in interventional therapy for coronary heart disease[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2025, 41(3): 176-180. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.003
Citation: ZENG Qiutang, YU Kunwu. Progress in interventional therapy for coronary heart disease[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2025, 41(3): 176-180. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.003

冠心病介入治疗进展

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金(No:82070310、81900400)
详细信息

Progress in interventional therapy for coronary heart disease

More Information
  • 介入治疗是目前治疗冠心病的重要方法之一。在过去的20年中,冠心病介入治疗研究百花齐放,取得了丰硕的研究成果,尤其是在策略、抗栓药物、新一代支架、药物球囊、功能学及腔内影像、钙化处理、左心辅助器械方面。该文就近年冠心病介入治疗最新进展进行梳理,以期为冠心病介入治疗的临床实践提供帮助。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): e18-e114.

    [2]

    Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(38): 3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191

    [3]

    Sardella G, Lucisano L, Garbo R, et al. Single-Staged Compared With Multi-Staged PCI in Multivessel NSTEMI Patients: The SMILE Trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 67(3): 264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.082

    [4]

    中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征诊断和治疗指南(2024)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(6): 615-646. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20240107-00014

    [5]

    Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(15): 1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922

    [6]

    Hochman JS, Anthopolos R, Reynolds HR, et al. Survival After Invasive or Conservative Management of Stable Coronary Disease[J]. Circulation, 2023, 147(1): 8-19. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062714

    [7]

    Mc Ardle B, Shukla T, Nichol G, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Outcomes With F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Coronary Disease[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 9(9): e004331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004331

    [8]

    Sun LY, Gaudino M, Chen RJ, et al. Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2020, 5(6): 631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239

    [9]

    Bloom JE, Vogrin S, Reid CM, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy: long-term survival[J]. Eur Heart J, 2025, 46(1): 72-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae672

    [10]

    Sabatine MS, Bergmark BA, Murphy SA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10318): 2247-2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5

    [11]

    Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery for 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 3 Trial[J]. Circulation, 2023, 148(12): 950-958. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065770

    [12]

    Lowenstern A, Wu J, Bradley SM, et al. Current landscape of hybrid revascularization: A report from the NCDR CathPCI Registry[J]. Am Heart J, 2019, 215, 167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.014

    [13]

    Ganyukov VI, Kochergin NA, Shilov AA, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical Versus Percutaneous Versus Hybrid Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 3 Years' Follow-Up[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 14(10): 1163-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.037

    [14]

    Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(11): 1045-1057. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327

    [15]

    Ge Z, Kan J, Gao X, et al. Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes(ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 403(10439): 1866-1878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00473-2

    [16]

    Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, et al. Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(21): 2032-2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419

    [17]

    Brophy JM, Belisle P, Joseph L. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(10): 777-786. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-10-200305200-00005

    [18]

    Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(23): 1773-1780. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843

    [19]

    Cassese S, Byrne RA, Ndrepepa G, et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10018): 537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4

    [20]

    Erlinge D, Andersson J, Fröbert O, et al. Bioadaptor implant versus contemporary drug-eluting stent in percutaneous coronary interventions in Sweden(INFINITY-SWEDEHEART): a single-blind, non-inferiority, registry-based, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10464): 1750-1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02227-X

    [21]

    Latib A, Colombo A, Castriota F, et al. A randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels: the BELLO(Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization)study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(24): 2473-2480. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020

    [22]

    Jing QM, Zhao X, Han YL, et al. A drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions in the side branch: a prospective multicenter randomized(BEYOND)clinical trial in China[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2020, 133(8): 899-908.

    [23]

    Gao X, Tian N, Kan J, et al. Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of the Side Branch During Provisional Stenting: The Multicenter Randomized DCB-BIF Trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2025, 85(1): 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.067

    [24]

    Cortese B, Testa G, Rivero F, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent for Small Coronary Vessels: PICCOLETO-II 3-Year Follow-Up[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2023, 16(9): 1054-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.02.011

    [25]

    Gao C, He XQ, Ouyang F, et al. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty with rescue stenting versus intended stenting for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions(REC-CAGEFREE I): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10457): 1040-1050. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01594-0

    [26]

    van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease(FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(10006): 1853-1860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4

    [27]

    Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(2): 128-137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112299

    [28]

    Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, et al. Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial[J]. Eur Heart J, 2015, 36(2): 100-111. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu338

    [29]

    Eftekhari A, Holck EN, Westra J, et al. Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(41): 4376-4384. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582

    [30]

    Berntorp K, Rylance R, Yndigegn T, et al. Clinical Outcome of Revascularization Deferral With Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve: A 5-Year Follow-Up Substudy From the iFR-SWEDEHEART Trial[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2023, 12(3): e028423. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028423

    [31]

    Song L, Xu B, Tu S, et al. 2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 80(22): 2089-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.007

    [32]

    Yang J, Shan D, Wang X, et al. On-Site Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Management of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The TARGET Randomized Trial[J]. Circulation, 2023, 147(18): 1369-1381. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063996

    [33]

    Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(18): 1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607

    [34]

    Holm NR, Andreasen LN, Neghabat O, et al. OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 389(16): 1477-1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770

    [35]

    Ali ZA, Landmesser U, Maehara A, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 389(16): 1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861

    [36]

    Li X, Ge Z, Kan J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes(IVUS-ACS): a two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 403(10439): 1855-1865. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00282-4

    [37]

    Angsubhakorn N, Kang N, Fearon C, et al. Contemporary Management of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(10): 1638. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101638

    [38]

    Lee T, Shlofmitz RA, Song L, et al. The effectiveness of excimer laser angioplasty to treat coronary in-stent restenosis with peri-stent calcium as assessed by optical coherence tomography[J]. EuroIntervention, 2019, 15(3): e279-e288. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00139

    [39]

    Rawlins J, Din JN, Talwar S, et al. Coronary Intervention with the Excimer Laser: Review of the Technology and Outcome Data[J]. Interv Cardiol, 2016, 11(1): 27-32. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:2:2

    [40]

    Redfors B, Sharma SK, Saito S, et al. Novel Micro Crown Orbital Atherectomy for Severe Lesion Calcification: Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System Study(COAST)[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2020, 13(8): e008993. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.008993

    [41]

    Généreux P, Kirtane AJ, Kandzari DE, et al. Randomized evaluation of vessel preparation with orbital atherectomy prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary artery lesions: Design and rationale of the ECLIPSE trial[J]. Am Heart J, 2022, 249: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.03.003

    [42]

    Karimi Galougahi K, Patel S, Shlofmitz RA, et al. Calcific Plaque Modification by Acoustic Shock Waves: Intravascular Lithotripsy in Coronary Interventions[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 14(1): e009354. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009354

    [43]

    中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会, 国家心血管病专家委员会心力衰竭专业委员会, 中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志编辑委员会. 经皮机械循环辅助临床应用及管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志, 2020, 4(3): 145-158. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101460-20200812-00078

    [44]

    Henry TD, Tomey MI, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2021, 143(15): e815-e829.

    [45]

    Helgestad OKL, Josiassen J, Hassager C, et al. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock[J]. Open Heart, 2020, 7(1): e001214. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214

    [46]

    Schrage B, Ibrahim K, Loehn T, et al. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(10): 1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  623
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2025-02-24
刊出日期:  2025-03-13

返回顶部

目录