Aldosterone escape in patients with essential hypertension after RAS inhibitors treatment
-
摘要: 目的:观察原发性高血压患者常规血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂 (ACEI) 及血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂 (ARB) 治疗后, 是否存在醛固酮逃现象及其区别。方法:入选123例原发性高血压的患者, 随机分成缬沙坦组 (61例) 和贝那普利组 (62例), 用放射免疫法测定治疗前、治疗后1、3、6个月时的血压变化和血浆肾素 (PRA)、血管紧张素Ⅱ (AngⅡ)、醛固酮的活性。结果:①治疗后两组血压均明显下降, 其血压下降的差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。②贝那普利组治疗1、3、6个月后血浆PRA活性与治疗前比较无明显变化, 差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05);治疗1个月后血浆AngⅡ活性较治疗前明显下降, 其差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05), 治疗3、6个月后血浆AngⅡ升高, 逐渐接近治疗前水平, 与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05);血浆醛固酮治疗1个月后显著下降 (P<0.05), 治疗3个月后上升, 与治疗前比较无差异 (P>0.05), 治疗6个月后较治疗前明显升高 (P<0.05)。该组62例患者治疗3个月后有24例并发醛固酮逃逸, 发生率约为39%。③缬沙坦组血浆PRA活性治疗1、3、6个月后较治疗前差异均无统计学意义 (P>0.05);治疗1、3个月后血浆AngⅡ活性较治疗前有所上升, 但差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05), 治疗6个月后较治疗前明显上升, 差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05);血浆醛固酮治疗1个月后较治疗前明显下降, 差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05), 治疗3个月后继续下降, 治疗6个月后血浆醛固酮有所升高, 但仍低于治疗前水平, 其差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。结论:长期 (3个月以上) 使用ACEI治疗的原发性高血压, 部分患者出现醛固酮逃逸现象;ARB在治疗过程中存在一定程度的醛固酮逃逸, 但其逃逸的程度比ACEI轻, 出现逃逸的时间比ACEI长。Abstract: Objective: To observe aldosterone escape in the therapy of essential hypertension with different RAS inhibitors.Method: One hundred and twenty-three patients with essential hypertension were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (80mg/d, n=61) or benazepril (10mg/d, n=62).The blood pressure, plasma PRA, AngⅡ, Ald levels were determined at the following time points:before treatment and first month, third month, sixth month after therapy.Result: ①The levels of blood pressure decreased in both groups, and no significant difference was found between them (P>0.05).②In benazepril group, the plasma PRA remained unchanged before and after therapy.After therapy for one month, the AngⅡ level was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05).However, after therapy for 3month and 6month, the AngⅡ level gradually increased to baseline level, without significant difference comparing with that before therapy (P>0.05).The Ald concentration notably decreased (P<0.01) after one-month treatment, however it increased after three-months therapy, without difference from that before therapy (P>0.05).There was significantly higher Ald level after six-month treatment than baseline level (P<0.01).Aldosterone escape was observed in 24 patients and the incidence was 39%.③In valsartan group, there was also no difference (P>0.05) between the PRA of baseline and that of one-month, three-month, six-month therapy.Compare with the baseline level, the concentration of AngⅡ slightly increased after one-month andthree-month treatment without statistical significance (P>0.05), but the concentration significantly increased after six-month therapy than that of baseline (P<0.05).After one-month treatment, the plasma Ald visibly falled compared with the baseline (P < 0.05).It continued falling after three-month therapy, however, it increased slightly after six-month therapy butstill lower than that of baseline (P<0.05).Conclusion: Aldosterone escape may be observed in some patients with essential hypertension when the treatment with ACEI last more than three months.To some degree, There is aldosterone escape during ARB treatment, however, the degree of escape is slighter and the time of beginning to escape is later than that during ACEI therapy.
-
Key words:
- essential hypertension /
- valsartan /
- benazepril /
- aldosterone escape
-
[1] STAESSEN J, LIJNEN P, FAGARD R, et al.Rise in plasma concentration of aldosterone during long-term angiotensinⅡsuppression[J].Endocrinology, 1981, 91:457-465.
[2] BOMBACK A S, KLEMMER P J.The incidence and implications of aldosterone breakthrough[J].Nat Clin Practice Nephrol, 2007, 3:486-492.
[3] FOLKERINGA R J, PINTO Y M, CRIJNS H J.Aldosterone levels after angiotensin receptor blocker treatment[J].Circulation, 2004, 109:e182.
[4] COHN J N, ANAND I S, LATINI R, et al.Sustained reduction of aldosterone in response to the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure:results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial[J].Circulation, 2003, 108:1306-1309.
计量
- 文章访问数: 37
- PDF下载数: 34
- 施引文献: 0