Clinical characteristics and significance of elderly patients (≥75 years) with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction after percutaneous coronary intervention
-
摘要: 目的:探讨接受介入治疗的高龄(≥75岁)急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的临床特征及预后。方法:回顾性连续收集2015-07-2017-12在我院行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的139例高龄(≥75岁)急性STEMI患者的临床资料。分析患者的基本临床资料、冠状动脉造影、临床用药以及术后预后情况,并对介入治疗预后不良事件的影响因素进行单因素和多因素分析。结果:接受介入治疗的高龄急性STEMI患者大多数具有高血压和血脂异常合并症,分别占总数的66.9%(93例)和93.5%(130例)。临床用药数据表明,使用利尿剂的患者较少,只占总数的30.2%(42例)。急性前壁下壁心肌梗死和急性前壁心肌梗死患者占总数的92.1%(128例)。1年随访表明,介入治疗预后良好的患者占61.2%(65例)。年龄>85岁、左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤50%、心率>75次/min的患者预后不良事件的发生率均较高(P<0.05)。多因素分析表明,高龄(OR=2.503,95%CI:1.014~6.179,P=0.047)及高心率(OR=2.928,95%CI:1.379~6.216,P=0.005)是影响介入后高龄急性STEMI患者预后的独立危险因素,而LVEF是保护因素(OR=0.365,95%CI:0.174~0.769,P=0.008)。结论:高龄、低LVEF、高心率是高龄急性STEMI患者PPCI术后预后不良的危险因素。
-
关键词:
- 高龄 /
- 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死 /
- 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 /
- 预后
Abstract: Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) who underwent interventional therapy.Method:The clinical data of 139 consecutive elderly patients(≥75 years old)with acute STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI) in our hospital from July 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected.The patient's basic clinical data,coronary angiography,clinical medication and postoperative prognosis were analyzed.And factors influencing the adverse prognosis of PPCI therapy were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.Result:Most of elderly patients with acute STEMI received PCI had hypertension(66.9%,n=93) and dyslipidemia 93.5%(n=130).Analysis of clinical medication data showed that fewer patients were treated with diuretics,accounting for only 30.2%(n=42).Patients with acute anterior inferior wall myocardial infarction and acute anterior wall myocardial infarction accounted for 92.1%(n=128).One-year follow-up showed that patients with good prognosis of interventional therapy accounted for 61.2%(n=65).The incidence of prognostic adverse events was higher in patients >85 years of age,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)≤50%,and heart rate >75 times/min,respectively(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age(OR=2.503,95%CI:1.014-6.179,P=0.047) and higher heart rate(OR=2.928,95%CI:1.379-6.216,P=0.005) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in elderly patients with STEMI after PCI,and LVEF was a protective factor for poor prognosis in elderly patients with STEMI after PCI(OR=0.365,95%CI:0.174-0.769,P=0.008).Conclusion:Advanced age,lower LVEF,and higher heart rate are risk factors for poor prognosis in elderly patients with acute STEMI after PCI. -
-
[1] Townsend N,Nichols M,Scarborough P,et al.Cardiovascular disease in Europe:epidemiological update 2015[J].Eur Heart J,2015,36(40):2696-2705.
[2] O'Gara PT,Kushner FG,Ascheim DD,et al.2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,127(4):529-555.
[3] 杨跃进,杨进刚,袁晋青,等.高龄老年(≥75岁)急性冠状动脉综合征患者规范化诊疗中国专家共识[J].中国循环杂志,2018,33(8):723-748.
[4] Arslan F,Bongartz L,Ten BJM,et al.2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation:comments from the Dutch ACS working group[J].Neth Heart J,2018,26(9):417-421.
[5] 陈吉,刘阳,陈惠卿,等.绿色通道及直接PCI对不同性别急性心肌梗死患者住院病死率的影响[J].临床医药实践,2017,26(1):25-29.
[6] 徐清斌,李延丽,马萍.急诊PCI患者再灌注时间窗对临床预后的影响[J].吉林医学,2013,34(6):1055-1056.
[7] 高晓津,杨进刚,杨跃进,等.中国急性心肌梗死患者不同年龄组心血管危险因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(40):3251-3256.
[8] 许志茹.急性前壁和前壁合并下壁心肌梗死患者入院时心电图与冠状动脉血管造影所示病变之间的关系及预测价值[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(7):556-558.
[9] 赵渝.高龄急性冠脉综合征患者临床特征及急诊经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗的有效性和安全性研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2018,26(5):21-25.
[10] 叶绍东,祁雨,孙中伟,等.75岁以上老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗长期死亡危险因素分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2018,26(5):268-273.
[11] 陈传俊,韩永生,陈晨,等.早期复极及其形态与STEMI患者发生室性心律失常的关系[J].山东医药,2017,57(17):51-53.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 250
- PDF下载数: 171
- 施引文献: 0