度拉糖肽对2型糖尿病患者外周血内皮祖细胞数量的影响

吕淑芳, 赵晓彤, 许慕蓉, 等. 度拉糖肽对2型糖尿病患者外周血内皮祖细胞数量的影响[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(7): 572-576. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.07.011
引用本文: 吕淑芳, 赵晓彤, 许慕蓉, 等. 度拉糖肽对2型糖尿病患者外周血内皮祖细胞数量的影响[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(7): 572-576. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.07.011
LV Shufang, ZHAO Xiaotong, XU Murong, et al. Effect of Dulaglutide on the number of endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(7): 572-576. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.07.011
Citation: LV Shufang, ZHAO Xiaotong, XU Murong, et al. Effect of Dulaglutide on the number of endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(7): 572-576. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.07.011

度拉糖肽对2型糖尿病患者外周血内皮祖细胞数量的影响

  • 基金项目:
    安徽高校合作攻关和公共卫生协同创新项目(No: GXXT-2020-025)
详细信息
    通讯作者: 陈明卫,E-mail:chmw1@163.com
  • 中图分类号: R541

Effect of Dulaglutide on the number of endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

More Information
  • 目的 了解度拉糖肽对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者外周血内皮祖细胞(EPCs)数量的影响及其相关因素。方法 选取60例口服二甲双胍1000 mg/d治疗的T2DM患者,随机分为二甲双胍增量组(MET组,30例,口服二甲双胍2000 mg/d)和二甲双胍联合度拉糖肽治疗组(MET-DUL组,30例,二甲双胍1000 mg/d联合度拉糖肽1.5 mg/周皮下注射),持续治疗4周。采用流式细胞术检测治疗前后CD34、CD133、KDR均为阳性的EPCs数量。结果 经4周治疗后,MET组外周血EPCs数量改变无统计学意义(P>0.05),而MET-DUL组中外周血EPCs数量[(45.8±11.6)/106cell∶(26.1±13.4)/106cell],一氧化氮(NO)[(118.9±18.6)μmol/L∶(71.6±13.9)μmol/L]均高于治疗前(P< 0.05),BMI[(26.3±2.6) kg/m2:(27.1±2.5) kg/m2]低于治疗前(P< 0.05)。MET-DUL组中ΔEPCs与ΔBMI、ΔFPG相关系数(r)为-0.296、-0.218(P< 0.05),与ΔNO的r为0.389(P< 0.05)。结论 度拉糖肽可提高T2DM患者外周血EPCs数量。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  两组治疗前后EPCs数量比较

    Figure 1.  Comparision of the number of endothelial progenitor cells(EPCs)between pre-treatment and post-treatment in two groups

    表 1  两组间治疗前后一般资料及临床特征比较

    Table 1.  Comparision of general data and clinical characteristics between pre-treatment and post-treatment in two groups  例(%), X±S

    变量 MET组 t/χ2 P MET-DUL组 t/χ2 P
    0周(30例) 4周(30例) 0周(30例) 4周(30例)
    男性 17(56.7) 17(56.7) 0.000 1.000 18(60.0) 17(58.6) 0.012 0.914
    年龄/岁 43.5±4.4 43.5±4.4 0.000 1.000 42.9±5.3 42.8±5.4 0.015 0.893
    病程/月 9.3±1.4 9.3±1.4 0.000 1.000 8.8±1.3 8.7±1.2 0.016 0.882
    BMI/(kg·m-2) 26.8±2.7 26.7±2.9 0.083 0.935 27.1±2.5 26.3±2.6 2.563 0.028
    SBP/mmHg 141±14 140±15 0.096 0.924 139±12 136±13 -0.167 0.238
    DBP/mmHg 94±11 94±12 0.077 0.967 93±12 93±12 0.019 0842
    FPG/(mmol·L-1) 7.4±1.1 7.0±1.2 2.400 0.030 7.5±0.9 6.9±1.0 2.773 0.022
    HbA1c/% 7.2±0.2 - - - 7.1±0.3 - - -
    TG/(mmol·L-1) 2.2±0.8 2.0±0.9 0.993 0.347 2.3±0.9 1.9±1.0 1.104 0.215
    TC/(mmol·L-1) 5.7±1.3 5.6±1.2 0.205 0.842 5.6±1.2 5.5±1.1 0.198 0.796
    HDL-C/(mmol·L-1) 1.4±0.3 1.4±0.4 0.106 0.918 1.3±0.2 1.4±0.3 -0.153 0.278
    LDL-C/(mmol·L-1) 3.5±0.5 3.5±0.4 0.113 0.853 3.4±0.3 3.2±0.4 0.764 0.426
    NO/(μmol·L-1) 68.9±14.7 73.6±13.9 -0.154 0.265 71.6±13.9 118.9±18.6 -10.537 < 0.001
    VEGF/(pmol·mL-1) 211.7±25.8 219.5±22.7 -0.113 0.312 208.3±26.7 222.7±27.1 -0.242 0.136
    SDF-1α/(pmol·mL-1) 2056.1±512.3 2069.4±496.5 -0.203 0.194 1989.6±531.7 2067.5±515.3 -0.198 0.176
    EPCs/106cell 27.2±12.3 28.9±13.4 -0.189 0.236 26.1±13.4 45.8±11.6 -8.563 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  两组治疗前后临床指标Δ值的比较

    Table 2.  Comparision of Δ value of clinical indices before and after treatment between two groups  X±S

    变量 MET组(30例) MET-DUL组(29例) t P
    ΔBMI/(kg·m-2) -0.11±0.08 -0.82±0.13 10.346 < 0.001
    ΔSBP/mmHg -1.08±0.11 -2.45±0.27 0.895 0.504
    ΔDBP/mmHg 0.02±0.04 0.03±0.02 -0.107 0.343
    ΔFPG/(mmol·L-1) -0.41±0.04 -0.52±0.09 1.276 0.152
    ΔTG/(mmol·L-1) -0.22±0.07 -0.25±0.10 0.374 0.723
    ΔTCH/(mmol·L-1) 0.09±0.05 0.08±0.04 0.186 0.836
    ΔHDL-C/(mmol·L-1) 0.01±0.01 0.01±0.01 0.068 0.971
    ΔLDL-C/(mmol·L-1) 0.01±0.01 0.09±0.05 -0.074 0.462
    ΔNO/(μmol·L-1) 6.14±1.08 38.9±9.83 -13.875 < 0.001
    ΔVEGF/(pmol·ml-1) 9.18±0.85 13.71±6.63 -1.187 0.185
    ΔSDF-1α/(pmol·ml-1) 13.95±5.37 49.26±25.32 -1.837 0.092
    ΔEPCs/ 10-6cell 2.12±0.97 19.97±5.86 -10.479 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  MET组ΔEPCs与其他临床指标Δ值间的Pearson相关分析

    Table 3.  Pearson correlation analysis of ΔEPCs with Δ value of other clinical indices in MET group

    变量 ΔEPCs
    r P
    ΔBMI -0.104 0.298
    ΔSBP 0.061 0.657
    ΔDBP 0.045 0.701
    ΔFPG -0.165 0.102
    ΔTG -0.098 0.321
    ΔTCH 0.013 0.828
    ΔHDL-C 0.084 0.593
    ΔLDL-C 0.057 0.687
    ΔNO 0.182 0.114
    ΔVEGF 0.102 0.301
    ΔSDF-1α 0.062 0.654
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  MET-DUL组ΔEPCs与其他临床指标Δ值间的Pearson相关分析

    Table 4.  Pearson correlation analysis of ΔEPCs with Δ value of other clinical indices in MET-DUL group

    变量 ΔEPCs
    r P
    ΔBMI -0.296 0.013
    ΔSBP 0.054 0.703
    ΔDBP 0.048 0.784
    ΔFPG -0.218 0.042
    ΔTG -0.189 0.088
    ΔTCH 0.018 0.801
    ΔHDL-C 0.075 0.605
    ΔLDL-C -0.101 0.287
    ΔNO 0.389 0.001
    ΔVEGF 0.161 0.159
    ΔSDF-1α 0.138 0.285
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  MET-DUL组中ΔEPCs与其他临床指标Δ值的多元线性回归分析

    Table 5.  Multiple linear regressions analysis of ΔEPCs with Δ value of other clinical indices in MET-DUL group

    变量 β SE t P 95%CI
    ΔBMI -0.217 0.097 -3.328 0.019 0.351~0.892
    ΔNO 0.396 0.127 7.591 0.000 0.195~0.767
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Htike ZZ, Zaccardi F, Papamargaritis D, et al. Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison analysis[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2017, 19(4): 524-536. doi: 10.1111/dom.12849

    [2]

    周子华. 新型降糖药物的降压作用[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2021, 37(8): 692-694. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXB202108002.htm

    [3]

    Scott LJ. Dulaglutide: a review in type 2 diabetes[J]. Drugs, 2020, 80(2): 197-208. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01260-9

    [4]

    Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes(REWIND): a doubleblind, randomised placebocontrolled trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10193): 121130.

    [5]

    王威, 张颖倩, 李中轩, 等. 内皮祖细胞促进损伤血管再内皮化的机制[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2019, 35(8): 763-767. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXB201908019.htm

    [6]

    Odent Grigorescu G, Rosca AM, Preda MB, et al. Synergic effects of VEGF-A and SDF-1 on the angiogenic properties of endothelial progenitor cells[J]. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2017, 11(11): 3241-3252. doi: 10.1002/term.2233

    [7]

    Hu Z, Wang H, Fan G, et al. Danhong injection mobilizes endothelial progenitor cells to repair vascular endothelium injury via upregulating the expression of Akt, eNOS and MMP-9[J]. Phytomedicine, 2019, 61: 152850. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152850

    [8]

    Mudyanadzo TA. Endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular correlates[J]. Cureus, 2018, 10(9): e3342.

    [9]

    Rigato M, Fadini GP. Circulating stem/progenitor cells as prognostic biomarkers in macro-and microvascular disease: a narrative review of prospective observational studies[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2018, 25(35): 4507-4517. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170920154020

    [10]

    沐世昌, 荚杨洋, 陈明卫, 等. 封闭式负压引流对轻中度缺血糖尿病足溃疡患者外周血内皮祖细胞数量的影响[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2017, 33(10): 816-821. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2017.10.002

    [11]

    Mudyanadzo TA. Endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular correlates[J]. Cureus, 2018, 10(9): e3342.

    [12]

    Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of cardiovascular outcome trials[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2019, 7(10): 776785.

    [13]

    Xu M, Zhao X, Zheng M, et al. Acute effects of sitagliptin on progenitor cells and soluble mediators in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes[J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2020, 58(9): 491-503. doi: 10.5414/CP203665

    [14]

    Fadini GP, Mehta A, Dhindsa DS, et al. Circulating stem cells and cardiovascular outcomes: from basic science to the clinic[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41(44): 4271-4282. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz923

    [15]

    Richards WO, Prutzman KB, O'Hea MF, et al. Bariatric surgery improves the circulating numbers and biological activity of late outgrowth endothelial progenitor cells[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2014, 10(5): 906-913. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.04.025

    [16]

    Iorga RA, Bacalbasa N, Carsote M, et al. Metabolic and cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 agonists, besides the hypoglycemic effect(Review)[J]. Exp Ther Med. 2020, 20(3): 2396-2400.

    [17]

    De Ciuceis C, Agabiti-Rosei C, Rossini C, et al. Microvascular density and circulating endothelial progenitor cells before and after treatment with incretin mimetics in diabetic patients[J]. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev, 2018, 25(4): 369-378. doi: 10.1007/s40292-018-0279-7

    [18]

    Luo X, Hu Y, He S, et al. Dulaglutide inhibits high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome activation[J]. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2019, 671: 203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2019.07.008

    [19]

    Wang R, Wang N, Han Y, et al. Dulaglutide alleviates LPS-induced injury in cardiomyocytes[J]. ACS Omega, 2021, 6(12): 8271-8278. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06326

  • 加载中

(1)

(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2018
  • PDF下载数:  406
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-11-30
刊出日期:  2022-07-13

目录