心肌运动定量技术评估冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄程度及预测预后的效能

胡海, 万青, 王铮. 心肌运动定量技术评估冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄程度及预测预后的效能[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2025, 41(3): 201-206. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.007
引用本文: 胡海, 万青, 王铮. 心肌运动定量技术评估冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄程度及预测预后的效能[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2025, 41(3): 201-206. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.007
HU Hai, WAN Qing, WANG Zheng. The efficacy of the quantitative cardiac motion quantification technique in assessing the degree of coronary artery stenosis and predicting prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2025, 41(3): 201-206. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.007
Citation: HU Hai, WAN Qing, WANG Zheng. The efficacy of the quantitative cardiac motion quantification technique in assessing the degree of coronary artery stenosis and predicting prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2025, 41(3): 201-206. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.03.007

心肌运动定量技术评估冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄程度及预测预后的效能

  • 基金项目:
    2024年度河南省中医药科学研究专项课题(No:2023ZY3056)
详细信息
    通讯作者: 王铮,E-mail:pal_99@126.com
  • 中图分类号: R541.4

The efficacy of the quantitative cardiac motion quantification technique in assessing the degree of coronary artery stenosis and predicting prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease

More Information
  • 目的 探讨心肌运动定量(CMQ)技术在冠心病冠状动脉(冠脉)狭窄程度中的评估价值及预测预后效能。方法 选取2018年12月——2020年12月本院收治的100例冠心病患者,所有患者均在入院后实施CMQ检查及传统冠脉造影(CAG)检查。并以CAG检查结果为金标准,分析CMQ技术对冠脉狭窄程度的诊断价值。随访1年,根据预后情况将患者分为预后良好组(70例)及预后不良组(30例)。比较两组CMQ相关参数。采用Spearman相关性检验分析CMQ相关参数与预后的相关性。绘制受试者工作曲线(ROC)检验CMQ参数评估患者预后的价值。结果 经CAG确诊,100例冠心病患者中Ⅲ级狭窄30例(30.00%),Ⅳ级狭窄70例(70.00%),CMQ技术评估冠脉狭窄程度的准确度为96.00%(96/100)。Kappa检验显示,CMQ评估的冠脉狭窄程度结果与CAG一致性较好(κ=0.903,P < 0.001)。预后不良组LVGLS、AP2LS、AP3LS及AP4LS绝对值均低于预后良好组(均P < 0.05)。Spearman检验显示,LVGLS、AP2LS、AP3LS、AP4LS与预后呈负相关(r=-0.412、-0.501、-0.375、-0.382,均P < 0.05)。ROC曲线显示,LVGLS、AP2LS、AP3LS、AP4LS单独及联合预测冠心病患者不良预后风险的AUC分别为0.773、0.787、0.783、0.766、0.910,其中联合预测的效能最高。结论 CMQ技术能准确评估冠心病患者冠脉狭窄程度,与CAG检查结果有较好的一致性,且CMQ相关参数LVGLS、AP2LS、AP3LS、AP4LS与冠心病患者预后关系密切,联合测定能很好地预测预后。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  超声心动图

    Figure 1.  Ultrasonic cardiogram

    图 2  牛眼图示左心室各节段及平均GLS

    Figure 2.  Segments of the left ventricle and the average GLS showed by blue eye diagram

    图 3  CAG示左前降支狭窄76%

    Figure 3.  76% stenosis of the left anterior descending artery showed by CAG

    图 4  CMQ相关参数预测不良预后风险的ROC曲线

    Figure 4.  ROC curves of CMQ related parameters predicting the risk of poor prognosis

    表 1  CMQ与CAG评估冠脉狭窄程度结果

    Table 1.  Coronary artery stenosis degree evaluated by CMQ and CAG 

    CMQ CAG 合计
    Ⅳ级狭窄 Ⅲ级狭窄
    Ⅳ级狭窄 27 1 28
    Ⅲ级狭窄 3 69 72
    合计 30 70 100
    κ 0.903
    P < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  不同预后组患者CMQ参数比较

    Table 2.  Comparison of CMQ related parameters in patients with different prognoses  %, X±S

    组别 LVGLS AP2LS AP3LS AP4LS
    预后不良组(30例) 18.36±2.05 17.29±2.15 17.28±2.04 18.34±2.11
    预后良好组(70例) 23.29±2.03 22.83±2.10 22.35±2.25 23.44±2.15
    t 11.097 12.004 10.609 10.930
    P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  CMQ参数与预后的相关性分析

    Table 3.  Correlation analysis between CMQ related parameters and prognosis

    参数 LVGLS AP2LS AP3LS AP4LS
    r -0.412 -0.501 -0.375 -0.382
    P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  CMQ参数预测不良预后风险的效能

    Table 4.  Efficacy of CMQ related parameters in predicting the risk of poor prognosis

    参数 AUC(95%CI) 截断值 SE P 灵敏度 特异度 约登指数
    LVGLS 0.773(0.664~0.882) 20.350% 0.056 < 0.001 0.881 0.629 0.510
    AP2LS 0.787(0.691~0.882) 20.190% 0.049 < 0.001 0.771 0.667 0.438
    AP3LS 0.783(0.684~0.882) 19.700% 0.051 < 0.001 0.814 0.667 0.481
    AP4LS 0.766(0.650~0.881) 20.300% 0.059 < 0.001 0.829 0.666 0.495
    联合 0.910(0.843~0.978) 78.859 0.034 < 0.001 0.957 0.700 0.657
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Wool TH, Ashley SC, Gupta VA. Determination of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Through Noninvasive Testing to Guide Revascularization in Ischemic Heart Disease[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2023, 204(1): 345-351.

    [2]

    Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADSTM 2.0-2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography(SCCT), the American College of Cardiology(ACC), the American College of Radiology(ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging(NASCI)[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2022, 16(6): 536-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.002

    [3]

    Peerwani G, Aijaz S, Sheikh S, et al. Predictors of Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography[J]. Glob Heart, 2023, 18(1): 26. doi: 10.5334/gh.1204

    [4]

    Sirajuddin A, Mirmomen SM, Kligerman SJ, et al. Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings[J]. Radiographics, 2021, 41(4): 990-1021. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200125

    [5]

    Yan JJ, Tian J, Yang H, et al. A clinical decision support system for predicting coronary artery stenosis in patients with suspected coronary heart disease[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2022, 151(Pt A): 106300.

    [6]

    程景华, 肖敏, 苟加梅. CMQ技术参数对急性心肌梗死再灌注术后心肌微循环障碍的评估价值[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(7): 846-849. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.07.002

    [7]

    葛均波, 徐永健, 王辰, 等. 内科学(第9版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社. 2018: 227.

    [8]

    肖双, 李昭屏, 陈少敏, 等. 冠状动脉轻度狭窄对非阻塞性冠状动脉胸痛患者冠状动脉血流储备的影响[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2024, 40(7): 536-540. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.07.006

    [9]

    Bertolone DT, Gallinoro E, Esposito G, et al. Contemporary Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease[J]. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev, 2022, 29(3): 207-219. doi: 10.1007/s40292-021-00497-z

    [10]

    Ghobrial M, Haley HA, Gosling R, et al. The new role of diagnostic angiography in coronary physiological assessment[J]. Heart, 2021, 107(10): 783-789. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318289

    [11]

    Vallée A, Zhang Y, Protogerou A, et al. Added value of aortic pulse wave velocity index for the detection of coronary heart disease by elective coronary angiography[J]. Blood Press, 2019, 28(6): 375-384. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2019.1641400

    [12]

    Wang RR, Tian T, Li SQ, et al. Assessment of Left Ventricular Global Myocardial Work in Patients With Different Degrees of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Pressure-Strain Loops Analysis[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2021, 47(1): 33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.017

    [13]

    沈嘉祺, 王玉玖, 卞斐, 等. 二维超声斑点追踪成像技术评价冠心病患者冠脉旁路移植术后心肌功能的临床价值[J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2023, 46(3): 171-175.

    [14]

    刘云, 耿笑端, 栗河舟, 等. 超声心动图自动心肌运动定量技术评估川崎病患儿左心室收缩功能[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2022, 38(6): 842-847.

    [15]

    马盼弟. 3D-STI与2D-LS评估冠心病患者CABG术前心肌存活性[D]. 河南: 新乡医学院, 2021.

    [16]

    梁慧青, 刘昕, 薛娜. 实时三维斑点追踪成像评价前降支病变患者左室局部心肌功能[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2018, 27(1): 17-22. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2018.01.005

    [17]

    李一鸣, 吴存刚, 李玉宏. 自动心肌运动定量技术评估2型糖尿病患者左心室功能[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(1): 34-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2023.01.009

    [18]

    何鑫, 张淑伟, 葛丽丽. 自动心肌运动定量技术评价亚临床甲状腺功能减退左室功能[J]. 锦州医科大学学报, 2023, 44(4): 97-102.

    [19]

    Le DE, Alkayed NJ, Cao Z, et al. Metabolomics of repetitive myocardial stunning in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis: Effect of non-selective and selective β1-receptor blockers[J]. J Physiol, 2024, 602(14): 3423-3448. doi: 10.1113/JP285720

    [20]

    Wang YN, Chen WF, Wang Q. Segmental and transmural motion of the rat myocardium estimated using quantitative ultrasound with new strategies for infarct detection[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11(7): 1236108.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  347
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-09-10
刊出日期:  2025-03-13

返回顶部

目录