STEMI患者PCI术后出现碎裂QRS波的危险因素及其预测价值分析

李雪莲, 徐茂森, 陆远, 等. STEMI患者PCI术后出现碎裂QRS波的危险因素及其预测价值分析[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2025, 41(6): 435-441. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.06.006
引用本文: 李雪莲, 徐茂森, 陆远, 等. STEMI患者PCI术后出现碎裂QRS波的危险因素及其预测价值分析[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2025, 41(6): 435-441. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.06.006
LI Xuelian, XU Maosen, LU Yuan, et al. Risk factors and predictive value of fragmented QRS in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2025, 41(6): 435-441. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.06.006
Citation: LI Xuelian, XU Maosen, LU Yuan, et al. Risk factors and predictive value of fragmented QRS in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2025, 41(6): 435-441. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2025.06.006

STEMI患者PCI术后出现碎裂QRS波的危险因素及其预测价值分析

  • 基金项目:
    徐州市卫生健康委科技项目(No:XWKYHT20230073)
详细信息

Risk factors and predictive value of fragmented QRS in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI

More Information
  • 目的  分析急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉(冠脉)介入术(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)后48 h内出现碎裂QRS波(fQRS)的危险因素,并进一步探讨其对术后1年内发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测价值。 方法  回顾性分析徐州医科大学附属医院2018年9月—2021年3月行PCI治疗的STEMI患者225例,术后随访12个月。根据患者心电图检查结果是否存在fQRS波,分为fQRS组和非fQRS组,比较两组患者的一般资料、血液学指标、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、冠脉造影结果、Gensini评分、心脏磁共振示微循环阻塞(microvascular obstruction,MVO)及期间MACE的发生情况。 结果  与非fQRS组相比,fQRS组患者血小板计数、中性粒细胞计数、超敏C-反应蛋白、肌钙蛋白T、肌酸激酶同工酶峰值更高,MVO发生率更高,梗死相关动脉狭窄程度更严重,Gensini评分更高,1年内MACE发生率显著增加,术后LVEF更低,均差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,血小板计数、中性粒细胞计数、cTnT峰值、梗死相关动脉(IRA)狭窄程度、MVO及LVEF是STEMI患者PCI术后出现fQRS的独立影响因素;年龄、Gensini评分、fQRS及MVO的发生是STEMI患者PCI术后发生MACE的独立危险因素。 结论  fQRS与STEMI患者的cTnT峰值、CK-MB水平、IRA狭窄程度以及Gensini评分密切相关,是PCI术后1年内发生MACE的独立预测因子。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  两组临床资料比较

    Table 1.  Comparison of clinical data 例(%), X±S, M(P25, P75)

    项目 非fQRS组(126例) fQRS组(99例) P
    年龄/岁 54.06±13.14 56.12±11.78 0.366
    男性 107(84.92) 89(89.90) 0.269
    吸烟史 55(43.65) 47(47.47) 0.567
    高血压史 60(47.62) 42(42.42) 0.437
    糖尿病史 35(27.78) 18(18.18) 0.092
    冠心病史 1(0.80) 0(0) 0.324
    BMI/(kg/m2) 25.79±3.23 26.42±3.62 0.331
    收缩压/mmHg 128.22±20.71 126.66±21.49 0.134
    舒张压/mmHg 81.37±14.02 81.25±13.49 0.587
    胸痛到球囊时间/h 5.5(3.0,9.35) 5.0(3.5,7.5) 0.567
    门球时间/min 62.47±17.17 61.29±17.34 0.818
    Killip分级 0.466
      Ⅰ~Ⅱ级 124(98.41) 96(96.97)
      Ⅲ~Ⅳ级 2(1.59) 3(3.03)
    N/(×109/L) 7.46(6.30,9.51) 9.99(7.84,11.62) < 0.001
    PLT/(×109/L) 206.00(165.00,230.00) 235.00(193.00,276.50) < 0.001
    hs-CRP/(mg/L) 11.95(5.08,36.50) 18.50(7.20,47.95) 0.046
    cTnT峰值/(ng/mL) 2.51(1.30,3.72) 5.04(3.45,8.32) < 0.001
    CK-MB峰值/(ng/mL) 100.23(41.55,221.80) 221.00(86.03,300.00) 0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol/L) 2.57(2.06,3.19) 2.90(2.31,3.26) 0.063
    血清肌酐/(μmol/L) 70.00(62.25,77.00) 70.00(63.00,78.00) 0.705
    LVEF/% 57.7±8.6 49.4±6.7 < 0.001
    MVO 47(37.30) 72(72.72) < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  两组冠脉病变及Gensini评分比较

    Table 2.  Comparison of coronary artery lesions and gensini score 例(%), M(P25, P75)

    项目 非fQRS组(126例) fQRS组(99例) P
    罪犯血管 0.039
      LAD 55(43.65) 60(60.60)
      LCX 22(17.46) 11(11.11)
      RCA 49(38.89) 28(28.28)
    血管病变数目 0.008
      单支病变 44(34.92) 35(35.35)
      双支病变 52(41.27) 24(24.24)
      3支病变 30(23.81) 40(40.40)
    狭窄程度/% 95.00(90.00,100.00) 99.50(90.00,100.00) 0.003
    支架直径/mm 3.00(2.75,3.50) 3.00(2.50,3.50) 0.084
    支架总长度/mm 29.00(21.00,35.25) 28.00(20.00,33.00) 0.396
    植入支架/个 0.824
      1 107(84.92) 83(83.84)
      2 19(15.08) 16(16.16)
    Gensini评分 34(24,43) 47(34,57) < 0.001
    血栓抽吸 14(11.11) 15(15.15) 0.627
    LAD:左前降支;LCX:左回旋支;RCA:右冠脉。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  fQRS波出现的单因素及多因素logistic分析

    Table 3.  Univariate and multivariate analyses of fQRS

    因素 单因素分析 多因素分析
    OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
    IRA
      RCA 1
      LAD 1.909 1.057~3.448 0.032 0.641 0.258~1.595 0.339
      LCX 0.875 0.370~2.068 0.761
    单支病变 1
    双支病变 0.580 0.301~1.119 0.104
    3支病变 1.676 0.876 3.207 0.119
    狭窄程度 1.058 1.022~1.095 0.001 1.058 1.022~1.095 0.020
    Gensini评分 1.060 1.039~1.082 < 0.001 1.065 1.010~1.123 0.032
    N 1.272 1.150~1.408 < 0.001 1.239 1.073~1.431 0.004
    PLT 1.010 1.006~1.015 < 0.001 1.014 1.007~1.022 < 0.001
    hs-CRP 1.003 0.998~1.009 0.268
    cTnT峰值 1.572 1.376~1.796 < 0.001 1.263 1.050~1.519 0.013
    CK-MB峰值 1.004 1.001~1.006 0.002 0.997 0.993~1.001 0.114
    LVEF 0.873 0.837~0.911 < 0.001 0.896 0.850~0.944 < 0.001
    MVO 4.482 2.532~7.933 < 0.001 3.631 1.486~8.872 0.005
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  两组住院期间发生MACE情况

    Table 4.  Comparison of MACE during Hospitalization  例(%)

    MACE 非fQRS组
    (126例)
    fQRS组
    (99例)
    P
    心源性死亡 2(1.59) 3(3.03) 0.074
    再次冠脉血运重建 3(2.38) 9(9.09) 0.026
    顽固性心绞痛 7(5.56) 13(13.13) 0.047
    心梗后心衰 2(1.59) 7(7.07) 0.028
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  MACE(-)亚组及MACE(+)亚组一般临床资料比较

    Table 5.  Comparison of general clinical data between the MACE(-) subgroup and the MACE(+) subgroup 例(%), X±S, M(P25, P75)

    参数 MACE(-)亚组(179例) MACE(+)亚组(46例) P
    年龄/岁 55.0(45.0,64.0) 62.0(53.0,67.0) 0.005
    男性 127(70.95) 31(67.39) 0.638
    吸烟史 80(44.69) 22(47.83) 0.703
    高血压史 80(44.69) 23(50.00) 0.519
    糖尿病史 41(22.91) 16(34.78) 0.099
    BMI/(kg/m2) 25.9±3.3 26.1±2.7 0.647
    心率/(次/min) 87.0(69.5,106.3) 80.0(69.5,99.3) 0.374
    收缩压/mmHg 128.0±21.7 125.8±18.4 0.533
    舒张压/mmHg 81.7±14.3 79.8±11.5 0.412
    胸痛到球囊时间/h 5.00(3.00,8.8.63) 5.50(3.50,9.00) 0.481
    门球时间/min 62.0±17.0 61.9±18.1 0.994
    罪犯血管 0.508
      LAD 88(49.16) 27(58.70)
      LCX 27(15.08) 6(13.04)
      RCA 64(35.75%) 13(28.26)
    血管病变数目 0.369
      单支血管 66(36.87) 13(28.26)
      双支血管 61(34.08) 15(32.61)
      3支血管 52(29.05) 18(39.13)
    狭窄程度/% 99.00(90.00,100.00) 99.00(90.00,100.00) 0.084
    支架直径/mm 3.00(2.75,3.50) 3.00(2.50,3.50) 0.273
    支架总长度/mm 29.00(20.75,33.00) 29.00(21.00,38.00) 0.446
    植入支架/个 0.080
      1 155(86.59) 35(76.09)
      2 24(13.41) 11(23.91)
    Gensini评分 34(24,42) 48(34,57) < 0.001
    血栓抽吸 22(12.29) 7(15.22) 0.853
    N/(×109/L) 8.41(6.70,10.52) 8.69(6.86,10.86) 0.738
    PLT/(×109/L) 217.00(172.75,257.00) 218.00(177.00,250.00) 0.971
    hs-CRP/(mg/L) 13.95(5.90,39.88) 18.30(6.50,38.30) 0.403
    cTnT峰值/(ng/mL) 3.19(1.43,4.97) 4.55(3.16,6.90) 0.001
    CK-MB峰值/(ng/mL) 138.05(42.48,285.60) 170.00(53.01,300.00) 0.253
    LDL-C/(mmol/L) 2.73(2.19,3.22) 2.87(2.15,3.26) 0.904
    血清肌酐/(μmol/L) 70.00(63.00,78.00) 70.00(59.00,75.00) 0.507
    LVEF/% 55.1±8.8 50.0±7.5 < 0.001
    MVO 83(46.37) 36(78.26) < 0.001
    fQRS 65(36.31) 34(73.91) < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  MACE的logistic分析

    Table 6.  Univariate and multivariate analyses of MACE

    因素 单因素分析 多因素分析
    OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
    年龄 1.041 1.011~1.071 0.008 1.037 1.004~1.071 0.026
    Gensini 1.033 1.016~1.050 < 0.001 1.028 1.005~1.053 0.018
    cTnT 1.134 1.022~1.258 0.018 0.848 0.711~1.013 0.069
    LVEF 0.932 0.896~0.971 0.001 0.978 0.930~1.028 0.376
    MVO 4.164 1.948~8.901 < 0.001 3.204 1.303~7.883 0.011
    fQRS 4.969 2.406~10.262 < 0.001 3.317 1.362~8.007 0.008
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(38): 3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191

    [2]

    Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(14): 1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575

    [3]

    Xie F, Qian LJ, Goldsweig A, et al. Event-free survival following successful percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction depends on microvascular perfusion[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 13(6): e010091. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010091

    [4]

    Shanmuganathan M, Masi A, Burrage MK, et al. Acute response in the noninfarcted myocardium predicts long-term major adverse cardiac events after STEMI[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2023, 16(1): 46-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.09.015

    [5]

    Luo GM, Li Q, Duan JW, et al. The predictive value of fragmented QRS for cardiovascular events in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Physiol, 2020, 11: 1027. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01027

    [6]

    Chan JSK, Zhou JD, Lee SR, et al. Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8: 738417. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.738417

    [7]

    Zangiabadian M, Sharifian Ardestani M, Rezaee M, et al. Fragmented QRS, a strong predictor of mortality and major arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Health Sci Rep, 2024, 7(2): e1888. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1888

    [8]

    Türkmen S, Bozkurt M, Hoşoǧlu Y, et al. Significance of fragmented QRS and predictors of outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Res Med Sci, 2024, 29: 23.

    [9]

    郑一歌, 李树仁. 短暂性ST段抬高型心肌梗死机制及最佳介入时机的研究进展[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2024, 40(9): 763-768. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.09.014

    [10]

    Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): e4-e17. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039

    [11]

    中华医学会心血管病学分会. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(10): 766-783.

    [12]

    Mair J, Jaffe A, Lindahl B, et al. The clinical approach to diagnosing peri-procedural myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary interventions according to the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction-from the study group on biomarkers of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)Association for Acute CardioVascular Care(ACVC)[J]. Biomarkers, 2022, 27(5): 407-417. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2022.2055792

    [13]

    Das MK, Khan B, Jacob S, et al. Significance of a fragmented QRS complex versus a Q wave in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. Circulation, 2006, 113(21): 2495-2501. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595892

    [14]

    Rampidis GP, Benetos G, Benz DC, et al. A guide for gensini score calculation[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2019, 287: 181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.012

    [15]

    Frantz S. Herzrhythmusstörungen[J]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2020, 145(8): 509. doi: 10.1055/a-0952-9549

    [16]

    Sung KT, Chang SH, Chi PC, et al. QRS fragmentation in preserved ejection fraction heart failure: functional insights, pathological correlates, and prognosis[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2023, 12(6): e028105. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028105

    [17]

    Weber C, Habenicht AJR, von Hundelshausen P. Novel mechanisms and therapeutic targets in atherosclerosis: inflammation and beyond[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(29): 2672-2681. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad304

    [18]

    Ajoolabady A, Pratico D, Lin L, et al. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: pathophysiology and mechanisms[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2024, 15(11): 817. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-07166-8

    [19]

    彭毅, 陈晓玲, 杨徐. 碎裂QRS波群对老年非ST段抬高性心肌梗死患者临床诊断及冠状动脉病变程度的预测价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(2): 133-137.

    [20]

    Dehghani MR, Shariati A, Haghjou A, et al. Prognostic value of fragmented QRS complex in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Herz, 2021, 46(3): 285-290. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04940-0

    [21]

    Kurtul A, Duran M. Fragmented QRS complex predicts contrast-induced nephropathy and in-hospital mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2017, 40(4): 235-242. doi: 10.1002/clc.22651

    [22]

    Bordbar A, Mahmoodi K, Anasori H, et al. Correlation of left ventricular ejection fraction drop and fragmented QRS with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. ARYA Atheroscler, 2021, 17(5): 1-8.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  35
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2025-01-11
刊出日期:  2025-06-13

返回顶部

目录