Short-term outcomes between endoscopic removal of the greater saphenous vein and no-touch technology applied to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
-
摘要: 目的:比较内镜取大隐静脉与不接触技术应用于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)近期效果。方法:选取2017年6月—2020年5月因冠心病在我院行CABG的患者77例,按照手术方式分为内镜组(46例)与不接触组(31例)。比较分析两组患者的围手术期资料等情况。结果:内镜组术后切口疼痛、麻木等并发症发生率明显小于不接触组,差异有统计学意义(29.03%∶10.87%,P<0.05)。两组在术后住院时间、呼吸机使用时间及重症监护时间方面均差异无统计学意义。两组均未出现死亡。结论:内镜辅助下获取大隐静脉具有创伤小、术后下肢并发症发生率低等优点,且不增加术后住院时间、呼吸机使用时间和重症监护时间。Abstract: Objective: To compare short-term clinical effects between endoscopic removal of the greater saphenous vein and no-touch technology applied to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery(CABG).Methods: A total of 77 coronary heart disease(CHD) patients scheduled for CABG were given either endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting(EVH Group, n=46) or no-touch greater saphenous vein harvesting(No-touch Group, n=31) from June 2017 to May 2020. The perioperative data including postoperative lower limbs incision complications were comparaed between the two groups.Results: Compared with the No-touch Group, the EVH Group had lower incidence of pain and numbness(29.03%∶10.87%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospitalization time, ventilator assist time and ICU stay time between the two groups. No death occurred in either group.Conclusion: Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting can significantly reduce lower limbs incision complications, whereas does not prolong postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative ventilator assist time, and ICU stay time.
-
[1] Nyström T,Sartipy U,Franzén S,et al.PCI versus cabg in patients with type 1 diabetes and multivessel disease[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,70(12):1441-1451.
[2] Ursulescu A,Baumann P,Ferrer MT,et al.Optilene,a new non-absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for CABG anastomosis.OPTICABG-A prospective international,multi-centric,cohort study[J].Ann Med Surg(Lond),2018,35:13-19.
[3] 冯杰莉,李昭屏,张喆,等.冠状动脉旁路移植术后远期左乳内动脉桥血管血流储备影响因素分析[J].临床心血管病杂志,2020,36(6):565-569.
[4] Gaudino M,Benedetto U,Fremes S,et al.Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery[J].N Engl J Med,2018,378(22):2069-2077.
[5] Mahmoud SA,Widrich J.Endoscopic vein harvesting[J].StatPearls.Treasure Island(FL):StatPearls Publishing,2020.
[6] Samano N,Geijer H,Liden M,et al.The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency,after 16 years,comparable to the left internal thoracic artery:A randomized trial[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2015,150(4):880-888.
[7] 高峰,庄熙晶,高洋,等.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中不同方式获取大隐静脉的近中期临床效果[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2019,21(10):1050-1053.
[8] 张伟华,李杰,张新,等.内窥镜获取大隐静脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的中期效果分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2016,36(6):829-832.
[9] 吴海波,徐殊,王强,等.冠状动脉旁路移植术中应用内窥镜采集大隐静脉的技术要点及近期效果评价[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2015,22(1):57-60.
[10] Papakonstantinou NA,Baikoussis NG,Goudevenos J,et al.Novel no touch technique of saphenous vein harvesting:Is great graft patency rate provided?[J].Ann Card Anaesth,2016,19(3):481-488.
[11] Ran J,Liu Y,Li Y,et al.The effect of endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery[J].J Thorac Dis,2020,12(5):1991-1998.
计量
- 文章访问数: 442
- PDF下载数: 244
- 施引文献: 0