创伤合并急性肺栓塞患者血浆D-二聚体最佳截点值探讨

刘鹏, 季颖群. 创伤合并急性肺栓塞患者血浆D-二聚体最佳截点值探讨[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(3): 241-245. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.03.015
引用本文: 刘鹏, 季颖群. 创伤合并急性肺栓塞患者血浆D-二聚体最佳截点值探讨[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(3): 241-245. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.03.015
LIU Peng, JI Yingqun. Preliminary study on the best cutoff value of plasma D-dimer in patients with trauma complicated with acute pulmonary embolism[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(3): 241-245. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.03.015
Citation: LIU Peng, JI Yingqun. Preliminary study on the best cutoff value of plasma D-dimer in patients with trauma complicated with acute pulmonary embolism[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(3): 241-245. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.03.015

创伤合并急性肺栓塞患者血浆D-二聚体最佳截点值探讨

  • 基金项目:
    国家重点研发项目(No:2016YFC1304500)
详细信息

Preliminary study on the best cutoff value of plasma D-dimer in patients with trauma complicated with acute pulmonary embolism

More Information
  • 目的 探索创伤合并急性肺动脉栓塞(APE)患者血浆D-二聚体(DD)的最佳截点值。方法 回顾性连续选取2014年1月—2020年1月我院收治的18~89岁225例创伤患者,其中合并APE组151例,非APE组74例。分析基础资料,应用血浆DD与CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)的ROC曲线得出新DD截点值,联合ISS评分及DD值ROC曲线,进一步改善诊断效能。结果 ① 在基础资料分析中,APE组DD及Wells评分均明显高于非APE组,APE组的ISS评分较高,其重伤及危重伤比例较高,而非APE组轻-中度伤的比例较高。②血浆DD值与ISS评分存在较弱的正相关性(r=0.0196)。ISS评分与CTPA结果的ROC分析得出最佳截点值15分。③血浆DD与年龄无明显相关性(r=0.00099)。④由于年龄与DD无明显相关性,血浆DD与CTPA结果进行ROC分析,得到新截点值3200 μg/L,灵敏度84.11%,特异度52.70%,阳性预测值78.4%,阴性预测值51.9%,曲线下面积0.609。为了改善诊断效能,我们应用ISS(15分)联合DD(3200 μg/L)与CTPA结果的ROC曲线分析,灵敏度92.05%(86.5%,95.8%),特异度50.00%(38.1%,61.9%),阳性预测值79%,阴性预测值75.5%,曲线下面积0.710。结论 创伤后合并APE应用传统截点值(550 μg/L)及年龄校正公式(年龄×10,年龄>50岁)诊断效能较低,应提高血浆DD截点值至3200 μg/L联合ISS评分(15分)用于该病的诊断,以提高诊断效能。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  血浆DD值与ISS评分的相关性分析

    Figure 1.  Relationship analysis

    图 2  ISS评分与CTPA结果的ROC曲线

    Figure 2.  ROC curve

    图 3  年龄与DD的相关性

    Figure 3.  Correlation between age and DD

    图 4  年龄组与DD的线性关系

    Figure 4.  Linear relationship between age group and DD

    图 5  DD与CTPA结果的ROC曲线

    Figure 5.  ROC curve

    图 6  DD联合ISS评分与CTPA结果的ROC曲线

    Figure 6.  ROC curve

    表 1  两组基础资料

    Table 1.  General data 例(%), X±S, M(P25, P75)

    项目 APE组(151例) 非APE组(74例) P
    年龄/岁 62.66±15.65 64.15±18.27 0.528
    男性 85(56.29) 44(59.45) 0.652
    心率/(次·min-1) 81.74±13.87 83.13±16.92 0.514
    咯血 3(1.99) 0(0) 0.222
    活动性恶性肿瘤 8(5.29) 0(0) 0.044
    既往VTE病史 2(1.32) 1(1.35) 0.987
    DD/(μg·L-1) 6690(3810,14050) 3195(2010,15790) 0.008
    简化Wells评分/分 3(1,3) 1(1,2) 0.000
    致伤原因
      交通事故伤 43(28.47) 23(31.08) 0.687
      高处坠落伤 37(24.50) 15(20.27) 0.479
      摔伤 71(47.01) 36(48.64) 0.818
    ISS评分
       < 16分(轻-中度伤) 50(33.11) 59(79.72) 0.000
      16~25分(重伤) 62(41.05) 10(13.51) 0.000
      >25分(危重伤) 39(25.82) 5(6.75) 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a system aticanalysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016[J]. Lancet. 2017, 390(10100): 1151-210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9

    [2]

    Shuster R, Mathew J, Olaussen A, et al. Variables associated with pulmonary thromboembolism in injured patients: A systematic review[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.024

    [3]

    Ho KM, Burrell M, Rao S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for fatal pulmonary embolism after major trauma: a nested cohort study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010, 105(5): 596-602. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq254

    [4]

    Guo YJ, Chang MH, Chen PL, et al. Predictive value of plasma(D)-dimer levels for cancer-related stroke: a 3-year retrospective study[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2014, 23(4): e249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.10.022

    [5]

    Kim EY, Song KY. Prognostic value of D-dimer levels in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy[J]. Surg Oncol, 2021, 37: 101570. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101570

    [6]

    Hisada Y, Mackman N. Cancer-associated pathways and biomarkers of venous thrombosis[J]. Blood, 2017, 130(13): 1499-1506. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-743211

    [7]

    中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺栓塞与肺血管病学组, 中国医师协会呼吸医师分会肺栓塞与肺血管病工作委员会, 全国肺栓塞与肺血管病防治协作组. 肺血栓栓塞症诊治与预防指南[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(14): 1060-1087. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.14.007

    [8]

    林庆荣, 杨明辉, 侯志勇. 中国创伤骨科患者围手术期静脉血栓栓塞症预防指南(2021)[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(3): 185-192. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20201228-00795

    [9]

    Rijneveld AW, Weijer S, Bresser P, et al. Local activation of the tissue factor-factor VⅡa pathway in patients with pneumonia and the effect of inhibition of this pathway in murine pneumococcal pneumonia[J]. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34(6): 1725-1730. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218807.20570.C2

    [10]

    Jiang RM, Pourzanjani AA, Cohen MJ, et al. Associations of longitudinal D-Dimer and Factor Ⅱ on early trauma survival risk[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2021, 22(1): 122. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04065-z

    [11]

    Langness S, Ward E, Halbach J, et al. Plasma D-dimer safely reduces unnecessary CT scans obtained in the evaluation of pediatric head trauma[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 53(4): 752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.017

    [12]

    Owings JT, Gosselin RC, Anderson JT, et al. Practical utility of the D-dimer assay for excluding thromboembolism in severely injured trauma patients[J]. J Trauma, 2001, 51(3): 425-429;discussion 429-430.

    [13]

    Zhang LD, Liu HB, Li YN, et al. Correlation analysis between plasma D-dimer levels and orthopedic trauma severity[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2012, 125(17): 3133-3136.

    [14]

    Yumoto T, Naito H, Yamakawa Y, et al. Venous thromboembolism in major trauma patients: a single-center retrospective cohort study of the epidemiology and utility of D-dimer for screening[J]. Acute Med Surg, 2017, 4(4): 394-400. doi: 10.1002/ams2.290

    [15]

    An ZP, Huang HB, Wang ZG. Correlation between plasma D-Dimer level and severity and prognosis in patients admitted at emergency department with trauma[J]. Clin Lab, 2020, 66(1): 100. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190520

    [16]

    杨超, 张旭, 李潭, 等. 创伤严重程度评分对多发创伤患者深静脉血栓形成的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(18): 2371-2374. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.18.013

  • 加载中

(6)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1441
  • PDF下载数:  307
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-10-26
刊出日期:  2022-03-13

目录